Where does RED.COM, LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), RED.COM, LLC ranks #5,106 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does RED.COM, LLC hold?

RED.COM, LLC holds 68 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2024, spanning 13 technology areas.

What is RED.COM, LLC's Innovation Score?

RED.COM, LLC has an Innovation Score of 39.9 out of 100 (top 37% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does RED.COM, LLC focus on?

RED.COM, LLC's top technology area is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television) with 59 patents, ranking #317 of 5,951 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 13 CPC subclasses total.

Is RED.COM, LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

RED.COM, LLC's recent grant velocity is -64% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for RED.COM, LLC's patents?

RED.COM, LLC's patents average 19.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the RED.COM, LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

RED.COM, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 68 granted patents across 13 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Red.com ranks #5,106 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 68 patents across 13 technology areas.

#5,106
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 37%
by Innovation Score (39.9/100): 19.0
avg claims per patent: -64%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R5106 · US Corporation #5,106 · 68 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 68 grants
UPPER-Q #5,106/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Omega
CPC-FOCUS H04N · 13 areas
INNOV-THIN 39.9/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -64% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Omega Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Red.com’s 39.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 14.6 pts (37%) Velocity 1.1 pts (3%) Breadth 12.7 pts (32%) Claim depth 11.4 pts (29%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Pac Tech—Packaging · near

40
RED COM · this assignee

40
TriVascular · near

40
Sirna Therapeutics · near

40
Venus Medtech… · near

40
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Red.com's Innovation Score is 39.9/100 (top 37% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Red.com?

Each dot is one of Red.com’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Red.com’s own 19.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Red.com vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Red.com's grants concentrate

RED.COM, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 13 CPC subclasses with 86.8% of grants classified under H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (15 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, Red.com sits between Omega Ltd. and Soongsil University Research Consortium Techno-park.

Red.com's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, RED.COM, LLC moved from 24 to 4 grants (0.17x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Omega

68
Ostendo

68
Progress Software

68
Purple Innovation

68
Repligen

68
Rohinni

68
Sailpoint

68
Soongsil Universi…

68
RED COM ◀

68

What this shows RED.COM holds 68 patents at rank #5,104, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near REDCOM

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,104 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04N (Pictorial Communication)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in REDCOM's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for REDCOM, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H04N (Pictorial Communication), REDCOM ranks #317 of 5,951 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (40 here).

TriVascular, Inc. 40 Pac Tech—Packaging Technologies Gmbh 40 Sirna Therapeutics, Inc. 40 Venus Medtech (HANGZHOU), Inc. 40

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (19.0 here).

Laboratory Corporation OF America Holdings 19.0 avg Optum Services (Ireland) Limited 19.0 avg The Strategic Coach Inc. 19.0 avg THE Trustees OF Princeton University 19.0 avg

Red.com's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

40 Top 37% higher than 63% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

RED.COM, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	8	11.8%
2016	9	13.2%
2017	15	22.1%
2018	8	11.8%
2019	10	14.7%
2020	8	11.8%
2021	6	8.8%
2022	2	2.9%
2023	1	1.5%
2024	1	1.5%

Which technologies does RED.COM, LLC patent most?

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 59

G03B - Apparatus OR Arrangements FOR Taking Photographs OR FOR Projecting OR Viewing THEM; Apparatus OR Arrangements Employing Analogous Techniques Using Waves Other Than Optical WAVES; Accessories Therefor 19

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 13

G02B - Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus 10

G11B - Information Storage Based ON Relative Movement Between Record Carrier AND Transducer 8

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 6

H05K - Printed CIRCUITS; Casings OR Constructional Details OF Electric APPARATUS; Manufacture OF Assemblages OF Electrical Components 4

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 4

H01S - Devices Using THE Process OF Light Amplification BY Stimulated Emission OF Radiation [LASER] TO Amplify OR Generate LIGHT; Devices Using Stimulated Emission OF Electromagnetic Radiation IN Wave Ranges Other Than Optical 4

G09G - Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Devices Using Static Means TO Present Variable Information 3

H04R - Loudspeakers, Microphones, Gramophone Pick-ups OR Like Acoustic Electromechanical TRANSDUCERS; Deaf-aid SETS; Public Address Systems 2

H01Q - Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials 2

H04M - Telephonic Communication 2

Top 13 of 13 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

RED.COM, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

RED.COM, LLC's lead technology class is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television), 86.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04N
Ranked #5,106 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare RED.COM, LLC against Omega Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 39.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.