USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

REC Silicon Inc

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 21 granted patents across 17 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C01B (Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, REC ranks #14,231 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 21 patents across 17 technology areas.

#14,231
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 47%
by Innovation Score (36.2/100)
18.2
avg claims per patent
-95%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R14231 · US Corporation #14,231 · 21 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 21 grants
  • MID-PACK #14,231/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Quantum Interface
  • CPC-FOCUS C01B · 17 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 36.2/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 18.2 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -95% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Quantum Interface LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How REC’s 36.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around REC

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows REC's Innovation Score is 36.2/100 (top 47% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for REC?

Each dot is one of REC’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). REC’s own 18.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

REC vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 20.920.92121.1 05101520 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Quantum Interface LLC - 21, 18.71Quantum InterfaceQueensland University of Technology - 21, 14.71Queensland Univer…Randl Industries, Inc. - 21, 1Randl IndustriesRays Optics Inc. - 21, 18.48Rays OpticsREI, Inc. - 21, 13.19REIRich Brand Industries Limited - 21, 3.86Rich Brand Indust…Riprup Company S.A. - 21, 11.76RiprupRosen Swiss AG - 21, 17.33Rosen SwissREC Silicon Inc - 21, 18.19REC Silicon
REC vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where REC's grants concentrate

REC Silicon Inc is a focused PatentsView assignee: 17 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under C01B (Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, REC sits between Quantum Interface LLC and Rosen Swiss AG.

Who files at REC's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows REC holds 21 patents at rank #14,227, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near REC

By rank, the assignees closest to #14,227 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C01B (Non-metallic Elements)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in REC's primary technology class.

REC's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

36 Top 47% higher than 53% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 201520162017201820192021 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
REC Silicon Inc patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 3 14.3%
2016 7 33.3%
2017 5 23.8%
2018 2 9.5%
2019 3 14.3%
2021 1 4.8%

Which technologies does REC Silicon Inc patent most?

Top 15 of 17 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

REC Silicon Inc's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • REC Silicon Inc's lead technology class is C01B (Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C01B
  • Ranked #14,231 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare REC Silicon Inc against Quantum Interface LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 36.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.