Where does RE2, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), RE2, Inc. ranks #33,016 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does RE2, Inc. hold?

RE2, Inc. holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2022, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is RE2, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

RE2, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 32.3 out of 100 (41st percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does RE2, Inc. focus on?

RE2, Inc.'s top technology area is B25J (MANIPULATORS; Chambers Provided With Manipulation Devices) with 6 patents, ranking #313 of 1,442 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

Is RE2, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

RE2, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -40% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for RE2, Inc.'s patents?

RE2, Inc.'s patents average 14.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the RE2, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

RE2, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B25J (MANIPULATORS; Chambers Provided With Manipulation Devices).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, RE2 ranks #33,016 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 7 technology areas.

#33,016
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 41st percentile
by Innovation Score (32.3/100): 14.5
avg claims per patent: -40%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R33016 · US Corporation #33,016 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #33,016/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Raylase
CPC-NARROW B25J · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 32.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 14.5 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -40% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Raylase GmbH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How RE2’s 32.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (23%) Velocity 6.7 pts (21%) Breadth 9.4 pts (29%) Claim depth 8.7 pts (27%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
RE2 · this assignee

32
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows RE2's Innovation Score is 32.3/100 (41st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for RE2?

Each dot is one of RE2’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). RE2’s own 14.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

RE2 vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where RE2's grants concentrate

RE2, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 75% of grants classified under B25J (MANIPULATORS; Chambers Provided With Manipulation Devices). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, RE2 sits between Raylase GmbH and RED DOG Mobile Shelters, LLC.

RE2's three-year grant acceleration

RE2, Inc. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Raylase

8
Rayotek Scientific

8
RB&W Manufacturing

8
Re-dai Precision…

8
Reapplix APS

8
Rearden Mova

8
Reaxing S R L

8
RED DOG Mobile Sh…

8
RE2 ◀

8

What this shows RE2 holds 8 patents at rank #32,988, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near RE2

By rank, the assignees closest to #32,988 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B25J (Manipulators)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in RE2's primary technology class.

RE2's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

32 41st percentile higher than 41% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

RE2, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	37.5%
2018	1	12.5%
2019	1	12.5%
2020	1	12.5%
2022	2	25.0%

Which technologies does RE2, Inc. patent most?

B25J - MANIPULATORS; Chambers Provided With Manipulation Devices 6

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 5

Y10S - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former Uspc Cross-reference ART Collections [XRACs] AND Digests 4

F16B - Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing 3

F16H - Gearing 2

H01R - Electrically-conductive CONNECTIONS; Structural Associations OF A Plurality OF Mutually-insulated Electrical Connecting ELEMENTS; Coupling DEVICES; Current Collectors 2

B23B - TURNING; Boring 2

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

RE2, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

RE2, Inc.'s lead technology class is B25J (MANIPULATORS; Chambers Provided With Manipulation Devices), 75% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B25J
Ranked #33,016 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare RE2, Inc. against Raylase GmbH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 32.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.