Where does Ranger Design Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Ranger Design Inc. ranks #27,235 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Ranger Design Inc. hold?

Ranger Design Inc. holds 10 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2025, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Ranger Design Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Ranger Design Inc. has an Innovation Score of 28.0 out of 100 (26th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Ranger Design Inc. focus on?

Ranger Design Inc.'s top technology area is B60R (Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 6 patents, ranking #484 of 1,969 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is Ranger Design Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Ranger Design Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Ranger Design Inc.'s patents?

Ranger Design Inc.'s patents average 11.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Ranger Design Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Ranger Design Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B60R (Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Ranger ranks #27,235 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 3 technology areas.

#27,235
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 26th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.0/100): 11.5
avg claims per patent: -50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R27235 · Foreign Corporation #27,235 · 10 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
MID-PACK #27,235/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH RAF Technology
CPC-NARROW B60R · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 28.0/100
CLAIMS-PAR 11.5 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: RAF Technology, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Ranger’s 28.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.3 pts (30%) Velocity 6.7 pts (24%) Breadth 6.1 pts (22%) Claim depth 6.9 pts (25%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Ranger Design · this assignee

28
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Ranger's Innovation Score is 28.0/100 (26th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Ranger?

Each dot is one of Ranger’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Ranger’s own 11.5 claims/patent is at or below the 13.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Ranger vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Ranger's grants concentrate

Ranger Design Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under B60R (Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Ranger sits between RAF Technology, Inc. and Rengo Co., Ltd..

Ranger's three-year grant acceleration

Ranger Design Inc. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

RAF Technology

10
Railway Equipment

10
Railway Technical…

10
Ramona Optics

10
Reaction 35

10
Recombinetics

10
Regenesis Bioreme…

10
Rengo

10
Ranger Design ◀

10

What this shows Ranger holds 10 patents at rank #27,225, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Ranger

By rank, the assignees closest to #27,225 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B60R (Vehicles)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Ranger's primary technology class.

Ranger's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

28 26th percentile higher than 26% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Ranger Design Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	2	20.0%
2018	3	30.0%
2019	1	10.0%
2020	1	10.0%
2022	1	10.0%
2024	1	10.0%
2025partial year	1	10.0%

Which technologies does Ranger Design Inc. patent most?

B60R - Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 6

A47B - TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture 4

B60P - Vehicles Adapted FOR Load Transportation OR TO Transport, TO Carry, OR TO Comprise Special Loads OR Objects 2

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Ranger Design Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Ranger Design Inc.'s lead technology class is B60R (Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B60R
Ranked #27,235 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Ranger Design Inc. against RAF Technology, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 28.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.