RAF Technology, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 13 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01G (Weighing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, RAF ranks #27,229 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 13 technology areas.
- #27,229
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 36th percentile
- by Innovation Score (31.1/100)
- 16.7
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R27229 · US Corporation #27,229 · 10 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
- MID-PACK #27,229/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH R3vox
- CPC-FOCUS G01G · 13 areas
- INNOV-THIN 31.1/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: R3vox Ltd (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How RAF’s 31.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around RAF
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- RAF Technology · this assignee 31
RAF Technology · this assignee
31 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows RAF's Innovation Score is 31.1/100 (36th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for RAF?
Each dot is one of RAF’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). RAF’s own 16.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where RAF's grants concentrate
RAF Technology, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 13 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under G01G (Weighing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, RAF sits between R.W. Beckett Corporation and Ranger Design Inc..
Who files at RAF's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- R W Beckett
R.W. Beckett Corporation
10 patents
- R3vox
R3vox Ltd
10 patents
- RAD AI
RAD AI, Inc.
10 patents
- Radial
Radial Electronics
10 patents
- Railway Equipment
Railway Equipment Company
10 patents
- Railway Technical…
Railway Technical Research Institute
10 patents
- Ramona Optics
Ramona Optics Inc.
10 patents
- Ranger Design
Ranger Design Inc.
10 patents
- RAF Technology ◀
RAF Technology, Inc.
10 patents
What this shows RAF holds 10 patents at rank #27,221, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near RAF
By rank, the assignees closest to #27,221 in granted patent volume.
- R.W. Beckett Corporation #27,217 · 10 patents
- R3vox Ltd #27,218 · 10 patents
- RAD AI, Inc. #27,219 · 10 patents
- Radial Electronics #27,220 · 10 patents
- Railway Equipment Company #27,222 · 10 patents
- Railway Technical Research Institute #27,223 · 10 patents
- Ramona Optics Inc. #27,224 · 10 patents
- Ranger Design Inc. #27,225 · 10 patents
Leaders in G01G (Weighing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in RAF's primary technology class.
- Ishida Co., Ltd. 72 in class
- Mettler-Toledo GmbH 57 in class
- Yamato Scale Co., Ltd. 39 in class
- A&D Company, Limited 30 in class
- Sartorius LAB Instruments GMBH & Co. KG 29 in class
- Bizerba SE & Co. KG 28 in class
- Mettler-Toledo (Changzhou) Precision Instruments Ltd. 28 in class
- Mettler-Toledo International Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 28 in class
RAF's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 36th percentile higher than 36% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 7 | 70.0% |
| 2016 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does RAF Technology, Inc. patent most?
Top 13 of 13 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
RAF Technology, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- RAF Technology, Inc.'s lead technology class is G01G (Weighing), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01G
- Ranked #27,229 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare RAF Technology, Inc. against R.W. Beckett Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 31.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.