Overall rank by patents
#27,226
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 6 technology areas, active 2015–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C07C (ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS).
The verdict
Reaction holds 10 US patents across 6 technology areas, rank #27,226 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Reaction 35, Llc has been granted 10 US utility patents between 2015 and 2024, placing Reaction 35, Llc at rank #27,226 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 6 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 19.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in C07C (ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS). As a US Corporation, Reaction 35, Llc is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Reaction sits between Railway Equipment Company (10 patents, rank #27,222) and Repros Therapeutics Inc. (10 patents, rank #27,230) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 31.8/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 2 grants, compared with 8 in the 2015–2019 window, a -75% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Reaction 35, Llc's 19.2 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 6 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Reaction 35, Llc against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
RAILWAY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
10 patents
RAILWAY TECHNICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
10 patents
RAMONA OPTICS INC.
10 patents
RANGER DESIGN INC.
10 patents
RECOMBINETICS, INC.
10 patents
REGENESIS BIOREMEDIATION PRODUCTS
10 patents
RENGO CO., LTD.
10 patents
REPROS THERAPEUTICS INC.
10 patents
REACTION 35, LLC
10 patents
What this shows Reaction holds 10 patents at rank #27,226, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #27,226 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Reaction's primary technology class.
Reaction's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 Top 61% higher than 39% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 30.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2018 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 10.0% |
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#27,226
Across all tracked assignees
31.8 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Reaction's 10 grants land it in the top 61% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.