USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

QTM, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 15 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive OR Combustible Propellant CHARGE; Weapons NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, QTM ranks #19,055 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 15 patents across 2 technology areas.

#19,055
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 41%
by Innovation Score (38.5/100)
34.9
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R19055 · US Corporation #19,055 · 15 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 15 grants
  • MID-PACK #19,055/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Professional Tool…
  • CPC-NARROW F41B · 2 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 38.5/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 34.9 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Professional Tool Products LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How QTM’s 38.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around QTM

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows QTM's Innovation Score is 38.5/100 (top 41% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for QTM?

Each dot is one of QTM’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). QTM’s own 34.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

QTM vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 14.914.91515.1 010203040 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Professional Tool Products LLC - 15, 1Professional Tool…Puffin Coolers LLC - 15, 2.67Puffin CoolersPulson, Inc. - 15, 22.87PulsonPurpleComm Inc. - 15, 24.07PurplecommQuantamatrix Inc. - 15, 11.33QuantamatrixQubicaamf Worldwide, LLC - 15, 5.07Qubicaamf Worldwi…Qunano AB - 15, 13.33Qunano ABQuantum Elements Development Inc. - 15, 17.6Quantum Elements…QTM, LLC - 15, 34.93QTM
QTM vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where QTM's grants concentrate

QTM, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive OR Combustible Propellant CHARGE; Weapons NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2022. By volume, QTM sits between Professional Tool Products LLC and Quantum Elements Development Inc..

QTM's three-year grant acceleration

QTM, LLC shows 8 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at QTM's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows QTM holds 15 patents at rank #19,049, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near QTM

By rank, the assignees closest to #19,049 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in QTM's primary technology class.

QTM's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

38 Top 41% higher than 59% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 202020212022202320242025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
QTM, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2020 3 20.0%
2021 3 20.0%
2022 2 13.3%
2023 3 20.0%
2024 3 20.0%
2025partial year 1 6.7%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

QTM, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • QTM, LLC's lead technology class is F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive OR Combustible Propellant CHARGE; Weapons NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F41B
  • Ranked #19,055 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare QTM, LLC against Professional Tool Products LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 38.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.