Q1 Nanosystems Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: Y02E (Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Q1 ranks #49,860 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #49,860
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 20th percentile
- by Innovation Score (26.5/100)
- 18.2
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49860 · US Corporation #49,860 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,860/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Q-ba-maze
- CPC-NARROW Y02E · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 26.5/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Q-ba-maze Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Q1’s 26.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Q1
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Q1 Nanosystems · this assignee 26
Q1 Nanosystems · this assignee
26 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Q1's Innovation Score is 26.5/100 (20th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Q1?
Each dot is one of Q1’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Q1’s own 18.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Q1's grants concentrate
Q1 Nanosystems Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under Y02E (Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2018. By volume, Q1 sits between Q-ba-maze Inc. and Qbic Technology Co., Ltd..
Who files at Q1's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Q-ba-maze
Q-ba-maze Inc.
5 patents
- Q-genetics Aps
Q-Genetics ApS
5 patents
- Q-state Bioscienc…
Q-state Biosciences, Inc.
5 patents
- Q ANT
Q.ANT GMBH
5 patents
- QA1 Precision Pro…
QA1 Precision Products, Inc.
5 patents
- Qardio
Qardio, Inc.
5 patents
- Qbas
Qbas Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Qbic Technology
Qbic Technology Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Q1 Nanosystems ◀
Q1 Nanosystems Corporation
5 patents
What this shows Q1 holds 5 patents at rank #49,864, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Q1
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,864 in granted patent volume.
- Q-ba-maze Inc. #49,860 · 5 patents
- Q-Genetics ApS #49,861 · 5 patents
- Q-state Biosciences, Inc. #49,862 · 5 patents
- Q.ANT GMBH #49,863 · 5 patents
- QA1 Precision Products, Inc. #49,865 · 5 patents
- Qardio, Inc. #49,866 · 5 patents
- Qbas Co., Ltd. #49,867 · 5 patents
- Qbic Technology Co., Ltd. #49,868 · 5 patents
Leaders in Y02E (Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Q1's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 6,395 in class
- Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha 3,460 in class
- LG Chem, Ltd. 2,639 in class
- LG Energy Solution, Ltd. 2,060 in class
- Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. 1,752 in class
- General Electric Company 1,650 in class
- Hyundai Motor Company 1,589 in class
- Honda Motor Co., Ltd. 1,355 in class
Q1's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 20th percentile higher than 20% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 60.0% |
| 2018 | 2 | 40.0% |
Which technologies does Q1 Nanosystems Corporation patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Q1 Nanosystems Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Q1 Nanosystems Corporation's lead technology class is Y02E (Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore Y02E
- Ranked #49,860 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Q1 Nanosystems Corporation against Q-ba-maze Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 26.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.