P.T. Archery LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive OR Combustible Propellant CHARGE; Weapons NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, P.t. ranks #32,966 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #32,966
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 16th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.0/100)
- 18.9
- avg claims per patent
- -86%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R32966 · US Corporation #32,966 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #32,966/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Overair
- CPC-NARROW F41B · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -86% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Overair, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How P.t.’s 25.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around P.t.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- P T Archery · this assignee 25
P T Archery · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows P.t.'s Innovation Score is 25.0/100 (16th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for P.t.?
Each dot is one of P.t.’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). P.t.’s own 18.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where P.t.'s grants concentrate
P.T. Archery LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 87.5% of grants classified under F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive OR Combustible Propellant CHARGE; Weapons NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, P.t. sits between Overair, Inc. and Panart Hangbau AG.
Who files at PT's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Overair
Overair, Inc.
8 patents
- Oxford Instruments
Oxford Instruments PLC
8 patents
- Oztent Australia…
Oztent Australia Pty. Limited
8 patents
- P-cure
P-cure Ltd.
8 patents
- P V Nano Cell
P.V. Nano Cell Ltd.
8 patents
- Pacraft
Pacraft Co., Ltd.
8 patents
- PAI Capital
PAI Capital LLC
8 patents
- Panart Hangbau
Panart Hangbau AG
8 patents
- P T Archery ◀
P.T. Archery LLC
8 patents
What this shows P.T. holds 8 patents at rank #32,779, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near PT
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,779 in granted patent volume.
- Overair, Inc. #32,775 · 8 patents
- Oxford Instruments PLC #32,776 · 8 patents
- Oztent Australia Pty. Limited #32,777 · 8 patents
- P-cure Ltd. #32,778 · 8 patents
- P.V. Nano Cell Ltd. #32,780 · 8 patents
- Pacraft Co., Ltd. #32,781 · 8 patents
- PAI Capital LLC #32,782 · 8 patents
- Panart Hangbau AG #32,783 · 8 patents
Leaders in F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in PT's primary technology class.
P.t.'s Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 16th percentile higher than 16% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2016 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2019 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2020 | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does P.T. Archery LLC patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
P.T. Archery LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- P.T. Archery LLC's lead technology class is F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive OR Combustible Propellant CHARGE; Weapons NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 87.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F41B
- Ranked #32,966 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare P.T. Archery LLC against Overair, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.