Overall rank by patents
#32,776
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2015–2018. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G01Q (SCANNING-PROBE TECHNIQUES OR APPARATUS; APPLICATIONS OF SCANNING-PROBE TECHNIQUES, e.g. SCANNING PROBE MICROSCOPY [SPM]).
The verdict
Oxford holds 8 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #32,776 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Oxford Instruments Plc has been granted 8 US utility patents between 2015 and 2018, placing Oxford Instruments Plc at rank #32,776 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 13.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in G01Q (SCANNING-PROBE TECHNIQUES OR APPARATUS; APPLICATIONS OF SCANNING-PROBE TECHNIQUES, e.g. SCANNING PROBE MICROSCOPY [SPM]). As a US Corporation, Oxford Instruments Plc is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Oxford sits between Ott-jakob Spanntechnik Gmbh (8 patents, rank #32,772) and P.v. Nano Cell Ltd. (8 patents, rank #32,780) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 22.9/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 8 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Oxford Instruments Plc's 13.8 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Oxford Instruments Plc against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Ott-Jakob Spanntechnik GmbH
8 patents
Otto Aero Company
8 patents
Outsense Diagnostics Ltd.
8 patents
Overair, Inc.
8 patents
Oztent Australia Pty. Limited
8 patents
P-CURE LTD.
8 patents
P.T. Archery LLC
8 patents
P.V. Nano Cell Ltd.
8 patents
Oxford Instruments PLC
8 patents
What this shows Oxford holds 8 patents at rank #32,776, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,776 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Oxford's primary technology class.
Oxford's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 Top 89% higher than 11% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 2016 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2018 | 1 | 12.5% |
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#32,776
Across all tracked assignees
22.9 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Oxford's 8 grants land it in the top 89% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.