Where does Project Phoenix, LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Project Phoenix, LLC ranks #10,145 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Project Phoenix, LLC hold?

Project Phoenix, LLC holds 31 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2025, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is Project Phoenix, LLC's Innovation Score?

Project Phoenix, LLC has an Innovation Score of 39.4 out of 100 (top 38% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Project Phoenix, LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Project Phoenix, LLC's recent grant velocity is +400% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Project Phoenix, LLC's patents?

Project Phoenix, LLC's patents average 22.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Project Phoenix, LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Project Phoenix, LLC

Q: What technology areas does Project Phoenix, LLC focus on?

Project Phoenix, LLC's top technology area is F04C (Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids ; Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Pumps) with 27 patents, ranking #22 of 587 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 31 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F04C (Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids ; Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Pumps).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Project ranks #10,145 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 31 patents across 8 technology areas.

#10,145
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 38%
by Innovation Score (39.4/100): 22.4
avg claims per patent: +400%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R10145 · US Corporation #10,145 · 31 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 31 grants
UPPER-Q #10,145/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Praxair S T Technology
CPC-NARROW F04C · 8 areas
INNOV-THIN 39.4/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 22.4 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +400% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Praxair S.T. Technology, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Project’s 39.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 12.0 pts (30%) Velocity 3.9 pts (10%) Breadth 10.0 pts (25%) Claim depth 13.5 pts (34%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Channel Medsystems · near

39
Mimecast Services · near

39
Molo Design · near

39
Project Phoenix · this assignee

39
uBiome · near

39
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Project's Innovation Score is 39.4/100 (top 38% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Project?

Each dot is one of Project’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Project’s own 22.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Project vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Project's grants concentrate

Project Phoenix, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 87.1% of grants classified under F04C (Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids ; Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Pumps). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (8 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Project sits between Praxair S.T. Technology, Inc. and Qingdao University.

Project's three-year grant acceleration

Project Phoenix, LLC shows 10 grants in 2022–2024 against only 17 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Praxair S T Techn…

31
Precor Incorporat…

31
Prestone Products

31
Prime World Inter…

31
Proteinsimple

31
Puff

31
Qingdao Hisense

31
Qingdao University

31
Project Phoenix ◀

31

What this shows Project holds 31 patents at rank #10,145, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Project

By rank, the assignees closest to #10,145 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F04C (Rotary-piston)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Project's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Project, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In F04C (Rotary-piston), Project ranks #22 of 587 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (39 here).

Channel Medsystems, Inc. 39 Molo Design, Ltd. 39 Mimecast Services Ltd. 39 uBiome, Inc. 39

Project's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

39 Top 38% higher than 62% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Project Phoenix, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	3.2%
2018	2	6.5%
2019	2	6.5%
2020	8	25.8%
2021	7	22.6%
2022	4	12.9%
2023	3	9.7%
2024	3	9.7%
2025partial year	1	3.2%

Which technologies does Project Phoenix, LLC patent most?

F04C - Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids ; Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Pumps 27

F15B - Systems Acting BY Means OF Fluids IN GENERAL; Fluid-pressure Actuators, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; Details OF Fluid-pressure Systems, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 17

F16H - Gearing 8

F04B - Positive-displacement Machines FOR LIQUIDS; Pumps 6

E02F - DREDGING; Soil-shifting 5

F03C - Positive-displacement Engines Driven BY Liquids 4

F01C - Rotary-piston OR Oscillating-piston Machines OR Engines 2

H02K - Dynamo-electric Machines 2

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Project Phoenix, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Project Phoenix, LLC's lead technology class is F04C (Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids ; Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Pumps), 87.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F04C
Ranked #10,145 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Project Phoenix, LLC against Praxair S.T. Technology, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 39.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.