CPC technology class · F03
F03C - Positive-displacement Engines Driven By Liquids
Positive-displacement engines driven by liquids. 404 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year grant trajectory.
- 404
- US patents granted
- #4/5
- in F03
- 3.4%
- F03 class share
- +9%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Positive-displacement Engines Driven By Liquids ranks #557 of 670 CPC technology areas - 404 US patents granted since 2015, with recorded grant volume up 9% over five years.
- #557
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 404
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Robert Bosch
- leading assignee (49)
- +9%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
How F03C's grant cadence moved
Between 2020–2024, F03C recorded 197 grants versus 180 in 2015–2019 (+9% equal-window velocity). Across complete years, output peaked in 2020 at 52 grants and bottomed in 2024 at 24 (+117% peak-over-trough). Lead assignee Poclain Hydraulics Industrie holds 6.7% of the class ; the top three share 12.1%.
Leaderboard read
F03C concentration, lead at 6.7%
Poclain Hydraulics Industrie leads this historical grant record at 6.7% of F03C - foreign corporation assignees hold 68% of class grants (124 of 183). Figures describe granted US utility patents in this CPC subclass, not current investment or legal strength.
- Leader's share
- 6.7%
- Top three share
- 12.1%
- Lead over #2
- 14
27 of 404 grants
of the class's recorded grants
more grants than Artemis Intelligent Power Limited
Where F03C sits inside F03
Among 5 subclasses in F03 (Machines OR Engines FOR LIQUIDS; Wind, Spring, OR Weight MOTORS; Producing Mechanical Power OR A Reactive Propulsive Thrust, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), F03C ranks #4 and holds 3.4% of the parent class's 11,891 recorded grants. Sibling chips below are the other subclasses in the same parent class, not the nationwide volume/lead-share peers further down.
Rising assignees active in F03C
Company-wide grant multiples (2022–2024 vs 2019–2021) among assignees with ≥5 patents in this subclass. Growth is company-wide; class patent counts are subclass-specific.
- #1 Abaco Drilling Technologies LLC 2.00x 5 → 10 company-wide · 7 in F03C
- #2 Danfoss Power Solutions Inc. 1.60x 10 → 16 company-wide · 6 in F03C
- #3 KYB Corporation 1.31x 64 → 84 company-wide · 9 in F03C
- #4 Danfoss A/S 1.17x 78 → 91 company-wide · 8 in F03C
- #5 ClearMotion, Inc. 1.17x 24 → 28 company-wide · 5 in F03C
F03C grants by year, peak 2020 (52)
US utility-patent grants per year in F03C, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 9% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads F03C?
The 12 most active assignees in Positive-displacement Engines Driven BY Liquids - wider bars mean more grants
- Poclain Hydraulics…
Poclain Hydraulics Industrie
27 patents
- Artemis Intelligent…
Artemis Intelligent Power Limited
13 patents
- Kyb 9
KYB Corporation
9 patents
- Hydro-gear Partnership 9
Hydro-Gear Limited Partnership
9 patents
- Danfoss Power… 9
Danfoss Power Solutions GMBH & Co. OHG
9 patents
- Danfoss A/S 8
Danfoss A/S
8 patents
- Linde Hydraulics & Kg 8
Linde Hydraulics GmbH & Co. KG
8 patents
- Abaco Drilling 7
Abaco Drilling Technologies LLC
7 patents
- Danfoss Power… 6
Danfoss Power Solutions Inc.
6 patents
- Smith International 5
Smith International, Inc.
5 patents
- Clearmotion 5
ClearMotion, Inc.
5 patents
- Hydac Drive Center 5
Hydac Drive Center GMBH
5 patents
What this shows Robert Bosch is the most active filer in F03C, holding 49 of the 404 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in F03C |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Poclain Hydraulics Industrie | 27 |
| #2 | Artemis Intelligent Power Limited | 13 |
| #3 | KYB Corporation | 9 |
| #4 | Hydro-Gear Limited Partnership | 9 |
| #5 | Danfoss Power Solutions GMBH & Co. OHG | 9 |
| #6 | Danfoss A/S | 8 |
| #7 | Linde Hydraulics GmbH & Co. KG | 8 |
| #8 | Abaco Drilling Technologies LLC | 7 |
| #9 | Danfoss Power Solutions Inc. | 6 |
| #10 | Smith International, Inc. | 5 |
| #11 | ClearMotion, Inc. | 5 |
| #12 | Hydac Drive Center GMBH | 5 |
| #13 | Kanzaki Kokyukoki MFG. Co., Ltd. | 4 |
| #14 | Dana Motion Systems Italia S.R.L. | 4 |
| #15 | Liebherr Machines Bulle SA | 4 |
| #16 | Project Phoenix, LLC | 4 |
| #17 | Mathers Hydraulics Technologies Pty Ltd | 4 |
| #18 | Innas BV | 4 |
| #19 | Norwich Technologies, Inc. | 4 |
| #20 | LifeCell Corporation | 3 |
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading F03C assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Questions about F03C
Which company holds the most patents in F03C?
Which F03C assignees grew fastest recently?
How does F03C compare inside parent class F03?
What to do with this data
F03C in context - here's where to go next.
- Poclain Hydraulics Industrie leads F03C with 27 grants in this class. See full portfolio
- F03C ranks #557 of 670 by grant volume among all tracked CPC technology areas. See the ranking
- Inside parent class F03, the largest sibling subclass is F03D with 7,370 grants. Explore F03D
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through 2026-05-15; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Methodology - F03C figures are USPTO PatentsView granted-utility totals for this subclass (404 grants in the tracked window).
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.