Where does Peri SE rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Peri SE ranks #7,175 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Peri SE hold?

Peri SE holds 46 US utility patents granted between 2022 and 2025, spanning 20 technology areas.

What is Peri SE's Innovation Score?

Peri SE has an Innovation Score of 58.8 out of 100 (top 4% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Peri SE's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Peri SE.

What does claim depth mean for Peri SE's patents?

Peri SE's patents average 16.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Peri SE patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Peri SE

Q: What technology areas does Peri SE focus on?

Peri SE's top technology area is E04G (SCAFFOLDING; FORMS; SHUTTERING; Building Implements OR Aids, OR Their USE; Handling Building Materials ON THE SITE; Repairing, Breaking-up OR Other Work ON Existing Buildings) with 41 patents, ranking #3 of 310 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 20 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 46 granted patents across 20 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E04G (SCAFFOLDING; FORMS; SHUTTERING; Building Implements OR Aids, OR Their USE; Handling Building Materials ON THE SITE; Repairing, Breaking-up OR Other Work ON Existing Buildings).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Peri ranks #7,175 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 46 patents across 20 technology areas.

#7,175
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 4%
by Innovation Score (58.8/100): 16.1
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R7175 · Foreign Corporation #7,175 · 46 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-SMALL 46 grants
UPPER-Q #7,175/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Nerudia
CPC-FOCUS E04G · 20 areas
INNOV-PAR 58.8/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.1 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Nerudia Limited (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Peri’s 58.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 13.3 pts (23%) Velocity 20.0 pts (34%) Breadth 15.8 pts (27%) Claim depth 9.7 pts (16%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Atmel · near

59
Built Robotics · near

59
Fusion Optix · near

59
Lapis Technology · near

59
Peri SE · this assignee

59
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Peri's Innovation Score is 58.8/100 (top 4% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Peri?

Each dot is one of Peri’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Peri’s own 16.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Peri vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Peri's grants concentrate

Peri SE is a focused PatentsView assignee: 20 CPC subclasses with 89.1% of grants classified under E04G (SCAFFOLDING; FORMS; SHUTTERING; Building Implements OR Aids, OR Their USE; Handling Building Materials ON THE SITE; Repairing, Breaking-up OR Other Work ON Existing Buildings). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (16 grants) versus a trough of 5 in 2022. By volume, Peri sits between Nerudia Limited and Precitec GmbH & Co. KG.

Peri's three-year grant acceleration

Peri SE shows 35 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Nerudia

46
Nortek Air Soluti…

46
Oblong Industries

46
Particle Measurin…

46
Phoenix Contact D…

46
Ping Identity

46
Pitney Bowes

46
Precitec & KG

46
Peri SE ◀

46

What this shows Peri holds 46 patents at rank #7,174, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Peri

By rank, the assignees closest to #7,174 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in E04G (Scaffolding)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Peri's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Peri, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In E04G (Scaffolding), Peri ranks #3 of 310 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (59 here).

Built Robotics Inc. 59 Lapis Technology Co., Ltd. 59 Fusion Optix, Inc. 59 Atmel Corporation 59

Peri's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

59 Top 4% higher than 96% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2022–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Peri SE patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2022	5	10.9%
2023	14	30.4%
2024	16	34.8%
2025partial year	11	23.9%

Which technologies does Peri SE patent most?

E04G - SCAFFOLDING; FORMS; SHUTTERING; Building Implements OR Aids, OR Their USE; Handling Building Materials ON THE SITE; Repairing, Breaking-up OR Other Work ON Existing Buildings 41

E01D - Construction OF Bridges, ; Elevated ROADWAYS; OR VIADUCTS; Assembly OF Bridges 10

B28B - Shaping Clay OR Other Ceramic COMPOSITIONS; Shaping SLAG; Shaping Mixtures Containing Cementitious Material, e.g. Plaster 7

E04B - General Building CONSTRUCTIONS; Walls, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; Insulation OR Other Protection OF Buildings 5

E04C - Structural ELEMENTS; Building Materials 3

F16M - Frames, Casings OR Beds OF Engines, Machines OR Apparatus, NOT Specific TO Engines, Machines OR Apparatus Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; Supports 3

F16B - Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing 3

B33Y - Additive Manufacturing, i.e. Manufacturing OF Three-dimensional [3-D] Objects BY Additive Deposition, Additive Agglomeration OR Additive Layering, e.g. BY 3-D Printing, Stereolithography OR Selective Laser Sintering 3

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 2

F04B - Positive-displacement Machines FOR LIQUIDS; Pumps 1

B28C - Preparing CLAY; Producing Mixtures Containing Clay OR Cementitious Material, e.g. Plaster 1

G05B - Control OR Regulating Systems IN GENERAL; Functional Elements OF Such SYSTEMS; Monitoring OR Testing Arrangements FOR Such Systems OR Elements 1

B66F - Hoisting, Lifting, Hauling OR Pushing, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, e.g. Devices Which Apply A Lifting OR Pushing Force Directly TO THE Surface OF A Load 1

F15B - Systems Acting BY Means OF Fluids IN GENERAL; Fluid-pressure Actuators, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; Details OF Fluid-pressure Systems, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

G01L - Measuring Force, Stress, Torque, Work, Mechanical Power, Mechanical Efficiency, OR Fluid Pressure 1

Top 15 of 20 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Peri SE's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Peri SE's lead technology class is E04G (SCAFFOLDING; FORMS; SHUTTERING; Building Implements OR Aids, OR Their USE; Handling Building Materials ON THE SITE; Repairing, Breaking-up OR Other Work ON Existing Buildings), 89.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E04G
Ranked #7,175 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Peri SE against Nerudia Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 58.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.