Where does Lapis Technology Co., Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Lapis Technology Co., Ltd. ranks #4,828 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Lapis Technology Co., Ltd. hold?

Lapis Technology Co., Ltd. holds 72 US utility patents granted between 2022 and 2025, spanning 26 technology areas.

What is Lapis Technology Co., Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Lapis Technology Co., Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 58.8 out of 100 (top 4% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Lapis Technology Co., Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Lapis Technology Co., Ltd..

What does claim depth mean for Lapis Technology Co., Ltd.'s patents?

Lapis Technology Co., Ltd.'s patents average 9.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Lapis Technology Co., Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Lapis Technology Co., Ltd.

Q: What technology areas does Lapis Technology Co., Ltd. focus on?

Lapis Technology Co., Ltd.'s top technology area is G09G (Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Devices Using Static Means TO Present Variable Information) with 50 patents, ranking #107 of 1,688 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 26 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 72 granted patents across 26 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G09G (Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Devices Using Static Means TO Present Variable Information).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Lapis ranks #4,828 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 72 patents across 26 technology areas.

#4,828
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 4%
by Innovation Score (58.8/100): 9.9
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R4828 · Foreign Corporation #4,828 · 72 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-SMALL 72 grants
TOP-DECILE #4,828/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Inguran
CPC-FOCUS G09G · 26 areas
INNOV-PAR 58.8/100
CLAIMS-PAR 9.9 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Inguran, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Lapis’s 58.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 14.8 pts (25%) Velocity 20.0 pts (34%) Breadth 18.0 pts (31%) Claim depth 6.0 pts (10%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Atmel · near

59
Built Robotics · near

59
Fusion Optix · near

59
Lapis Technology · this assignee

59
Peri SE · near

59
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Lapis's Innovation Score is 58.8/100 (top 4% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Lapis?

Each dot is one of Lapis’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Lapis’s own 9.9 claims/patent is at or below the 16.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Lapis vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Lapis's grants concentrate

Lapis Technology Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 26 CPC subclasses with 69.4% of grants classified under G09G (Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Devices Using Static Means TO Present Variable Information). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (25 grants) versus a trough of 5 in 2022. By volume, Lapis sits between Inguran, LLC and Pella Corporation.

Lapis's three-year grant acceleration

Lapis Technology Co., Ltd. shows 50 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Inguran

72
Ion Beam Applicat…

72
JIO Platforms

72
Konica Minolta Bu…

72
Li-cor

72
OCÉ- B V

72
Panpsy

72
Pella

72
Lapis Technology ◀

72

What this shows Lapis holds 72 patents at rank #4,827, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Lapis

By rank, the assignees closest to #4,827 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G09G (Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Device…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Lapis's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Lapis, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G09G (Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Device…), Lapis ranks #107 of 1,688 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (59 here).

Built Robotics Inc. 59 Peri SE 59 Atmel Corporation 59 Fusion Optix, Inc. 59

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (9.9 here).

Nidec Tosok Corporation 9.9 avg Nippon Telegraph AND Telephone Corporation 9.9 avg Musashi Seimitsu Industry Co., Ltd. 9.9 avg ISP Investments LLC 9.9 avg

Lapis's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

59 Top 4% higher than 96% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2022–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Lapis Technology Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2022	5	6.9%
2023	20	27.8%
2024	25	34.7%
2025partial year	22	30.6%

Which technologies does Lapis Technology Co., Ltd. patent most?

G09G - Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Devices Using Static Means TO Present Variable Information 50

H03K - Pulse Technique 13

G02F - Optical Devices OR Arrangements FOR THE Control OF Light BY Modification OF THE Optical Properties OF THE Media OF THE Elements Involved THEREIN; Non-linear OPTICS; Frequency-changing OF LIGHT; Optical Logic ELEMENTS; Optical ANALOGUE/DIGITAL Converters 4

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 3

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 3

G11C - Static Stores 3

H03F - Amplifiers 3

H03B - Generation OF Oscillations, Directly OR BY Frequency-changing, BY Circuits Employing Active Elements Which Operate IN A Non-switching MANNER; Generation OF Noise BY Such Circuits 3

G05F - Systems FOR Regulating Electric OR Magnetic Variables 3

Y02D - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN Information AND Communication Technologies [ICT], I.E. Information AND Communication Technologies Aiming AT THE Reduction OF Their OWN Energy USE 2

H03M - CODING; DECODING; Code Conversion IN General 2

G01R - Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables 2

H02M - Apparatus FOR Conversion Between AC AND AC, Between AC AND DC, OR Between DC AND DC, AND FOR USE With Mains OR Similar Power Supply SYSTEMS; Conversion OF DC OR AC Input Power Into Surge Output POWER; Control OR Regulation Thereof 2

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 2

H03L - Automatic Control, Starting, Synchronisation OR Stabilisation OF Generators OF Electronic Oscillations OR Pulses 2

Top 15 of 26 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Lapis Technology Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Lapis Technology Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is G09G (Arrangements OR Circuits FOR Control OF Indicating Devices Using Static Means TO Present Variable Information), 69.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G09G
Ranked #4,828 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Lapis Technology Co., Ltd. against Inguran, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 58.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.