CPC technology class · B28
B28C - Preparing Clay
Preparing clay; producing mixtures containing clay or cementitious material, e.g. plaster. 511 US utility patents granted 2015–2025, with the leading assignees and year-by-year grant trajectory.
- 511
- US patents granted
- #3/3
- in B28
- 9.9%
- B28 class share
- +42%
- 5-yr velocity
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Preparing Clay ranks #540 of 670 CPC technology areas - 511 US patents granted since 2015, with recorded grant volume up 42% over five years.
- #540
- of 670 CPC technology areas
- 511
- US patents granted, 2015–2025
- Oshkosh
- leading assignee (50)
- +42%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
How B28C's grant cadence moved
Between 2020–2024, B28C recorded 262 grants versus 185 in 2015–2019 (+42% equal-window velocity). Across complete years, output peaked in 2024 at 61 grants and bottomed in 2015 at 24 (+154% peak-over-trough). Lead assignee Oshkosh Corporation holds 9.8% of the class ; the top three share 17.2%.
Leaderboard read
B28C concentration, lead at 9.8%
Oshkosh Corporation leads this historical grant record at 9.8% of B28C - us corporation assignees hold 71% of class grants (176 of 249). Figures describe granted US utility patents in this CPC subclass, not current investment or legal strength.
- Leader's share
- 9.8%
- Top three share
- 17.2%
- Lead over #2
- 31
50 of 511 grants
of the class's recorded grants
more grants than United States Gypsum Company
Where B28C sits inside B28
Among 3 subclasses in B28 (Working Cement, Clay, OR Stone), B28C ranks #3 and holds 9.9% of the parent class's 5,141 recorded grants. Sibling chips below are the other subclasses in the same parent class, not the nationwide volume/lead-share peers further down.
Rising assignees active in B28C
Company-wide grant multiples (2022–2024 vs 2019–2021) among assignees with ≥5 patents in this subclass. Growth is company-wide; class patent counts are subclass-specific.
- #1 Oshkosh Corporation 2.23x 130 → 290 company-wide · 50 in B28C
- #2 Verifi LLC 1.50x 4 → 6 company-wide · 16 in B28C
- #3 Yoshino Gypsum Co., Ltd. 1.42x 12 → 17 company-wide · 6 in B28C
- #4 En-tech Corporation 1.40x 5 → 7 company-wide · 9 in B28C
- #5 Alkon Corporation 1.33x 6 → 8 company-wide · 13 in B28C
B28C grants by year, peak 2024 (61)
US utility-patent grants per year in B28C, 2015–2025 - recent five years are up 42% versus 2015–2019.
Who leads B28C?
The 12 most active assignees in Preparing CLAY; Producing Mixtures Containing Clay OR Cementitious Material, e.g. Plaster - wider bars mean more grants
- Oshkosh
Oshkosh Corporation
50 patents
- United States Gypsum 19
United States Gypsum Company
19 patents
- Carboncure 19
Carboncure Technologies Inc.
19 patents
- Verifi 16
Verifi LLC
16 patents
- Alkon 13
Alkon Corporation
13 patents
- Gcp Applied 9
GCP Applied Technologies Inc.
9 patents
- En-tech 9
En-tech Corporation
9 patents
- Kyb 8
KYB Corporation
8 patents
- Quipip 8
Quipip, LLC
8 patents
- Cifa S P A 7
Cifa S.P.A.
7 patents
- Con-tech Manufacturing 7
Con-Tech Manufacturing, Inc.
7 patents
- Sebastos 7
Sebastos Technologies, Inc.
7 patents
What this shows Oshkosh is the most active filer in B28C, holding 50 of the 511 patents in this class. Concentration at the top signals how contestable this technology area is for new entrants.
View data table
| Rank | Company | Patents in B28C |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Oshkosh Corporation | 50 |
| #2 | United States Gypsum Company | 19 |
| #3 | Carboncure Technologies Inc. | 19 |
| #4 | Verifi LLC | 16 |
| #5 | Alkon Corporation | 13 |
| #6 | GCP Applied Technologies Inc. | 9 |
| #7 | En-tech Corporation | 9 |
| #8 | KYB Corporation | 8 |
| #9 | Quipip, LLC | 8 |
| #10 | Cifa S.P.A. | 7 |
| #11 | Con-Tech Manufacturing, Inc. | 7 |
| #12 | Sebastos Technologies, Inc. | 7 |
| #13 | Yoshino Gypsum Co., Ltd. | 6 |
| #14 | Giatec Scientific Inc. | 5 |
| #15 | Bautex Systems, LLC | 5 |
| #16 | Icon Technology, Inc. | 4 |
| #17 | J&P Invesco LLC | 4 |
| #18 | Concrete Products Group LLC | 4 |
| #19 | U.S. Well Services, LLC | 3 |
| #20 | Kangwon National University University-Industry Cooperation Foundation | 3 |
Footprint here vs. claim strategy
Each dot is a leading B28C assignee, placed by how many patents it holds in this class (horizontal) against its company-wide average claims per patent (vertical) - a read on whether the class is led by broad-but-shallow filers or focused deep-claim players.
Classes near B28C's 511-grant footprint
Nationwide nearest neighbors for B28C (#540 of 670 by volume ; lead share 9.8%) - not the B28 parent-class siblings above.
Questions about B28C
Which company holds the most patents in B28C?
Which B28C assignees grew fastest recently?
How does B28C compare inside parent class B28?
What to do with this data
B28C in context - here's where to go next.
- Oshkosh Corporation leads B28C with 50 grants in this class. See full portfolio
- B28C ranks #540 of 670 by grant volume among all tracked CPC technology areas. See the ranking
- Inside parent class B28, the largest sibling subclass is B28B with 3,309 grants. Explore B28B
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through 2026-05-15; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Methodology - B28C figures are USPTO PatentsView granted-utility totals for this subclass (511 grants in the tracked window).
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.