Where does Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine ranks #32,827 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine hold?

Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2018, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine's Innovation Score?

Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine has an Innovation Score of 30.3 out of 100 (34th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine focus on?

Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine's top technology area is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification) with 8 patents, ranking #2,086 of 7,127 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

Is Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine's recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine's patents?

Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine's patents average 22.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine

Q: How is the Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Perception ranks #32,827 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 7 technology areas.

#32,827
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 34th percentile
by Innovation Score (30.3/100): 22.3
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R32827 · US Corporation #32,827 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #32,827/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Pencil Learning
CPC-NARROW A61B · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 30.3/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 22.3 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Pencil Learning Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Perception’s 30.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (25%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 9.4 pts (31%) Claim depth 13.4 pts (44%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Perception Raisonnem… · this assignee

30
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Perception's Innovation Score is 30.3/100 (34th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Perception?

Each dot is one of Perception’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Perception’s own 22.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 4.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Perception vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Perception's grants concentrate

Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Perception sits between Pencil Learning Technologies, Inc. and Performance Fabrics, Inc..

Pencil Learning

8
Penta 5 USA

8
Pentair Filtratio…

8
Pentair Thermal M…

8
Perch Acquisition…

8
Perfect Fit Brand

8
Performance Appar…

8
Performance Fabri…

8
Perception Raison… ◀

8

What this shows Perception holds 8 patents at rank #32,878, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Perception

By rank, the assignees closest to #32,878 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Perception's primary technology class.

Perception's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 34th percentile higher than 34% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2018

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	6	75.0%
2016	1	12.5%
2018	1	12.5%

Which technologies does Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine patent most?

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 8

A61F - Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive DEVICES; FOMENTATION; Treatment OR Protection OF Eyes OR EARS; Bandages, Dressings OR Absorbent PADS; Firs 3

G09B - Educational OR Demonstration APPLIANCES; Appliances FOR Teaching, OR Communicating With, THE Blind, Deaf OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; Diagrams 1

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 1

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 1

B25J - MANIPULATORS; Chambers Provided With Manipulation Devices 1

Y10S - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former Uspc Cross-reference ART Collections [XRACs] AND Digests 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine's lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
Ranked #32,827 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine against Pencil Learning Technologies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 30.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.