Overall rank by patents
#4,304
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 83 granted patents across 12 technology areas, active 2019–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G06N (COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS).
The verdict
Perceive holds 83 US patents across 12 technology areas, rank #4,304 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Perceive Corporation has been granted 83 US utility patents between 2019 and 2024, placing Perceive Corporation at rank #4,304 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 12 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 19.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in G06N (COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS). As a US Corporation, Perceive Corporation is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Perceive sits between National Yang-ming University (83 patents, rank #4,300) and The Wistar Institute Of Anatomy And Biology (83 patents, rank #4,308) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 55.8/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 82 grants, compared with 1 in the 2015–2019 window, a +8100% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Perceive Corporation's 19.8 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 12 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Perceive Corporation against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
NATIONAL YANG-MING UNIVERSITY
83 patents
NHN CORPORATION
83 patents
Newtonoid Technologies, L.L.C.
83 patents
Oridion Medical 1987 Ltd.
83 patents
TATSUTA ELECTRIC WIRE & CABLE CO., LTD.
83 patents
TOYOTA SHATAI KABUSHIKI KAISHA
83 patents
The Coleman Company, Inc.
83 patents
The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology
83 patents
Perceive Corporation
83 patents
What this shows Perceive holds 83 patents at rank #4,304, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #4,304 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Perceive's primary technology class.
Perceive's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
56 Top 7% higher than 93% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 | 1.2% |
| 2020 | 7 | 8.4% |
| 2021 | 16 | 19.3% |
| 2022 | 21 | 25.3% |
| 2023 | 14 | 16.9% |
| 2024 | 24 | 28.9% |
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#4,304
Across all tracked assignees
55.8 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Perceive's 83 grants land it in the top 7% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.