Where does Perceive Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Perceive Corporation ranks #4,304 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Perceive Corporation hold?

Perceive Corporation holds 83 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2024, spanning 12 technology areas.

What is Perceive Corporation's Innovation Score?

Perceive Corporation has an Innovation Score of 55.8 out of 100 (top 7% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Perceive Corporation focus on?

Perceive Corporation's top technology area is G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models) with 83 patents, ranking #114 of 4,479 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 12 CPC subclasses total.

Is Perceive Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Perceive Corporation's recent grant velocity is +8100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Perceive Corporation's patents?

Perceive Corporation's patents average 19.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Perceive Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Perceive Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 83 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Perceive ranks #4,304 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 83 patents across 12 technology areas.

#4,304
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 7%
by Innovation Score (55.8/100): 19.8
avg claims per patent: +8100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R4304 · US Corporation #4,304 · 83 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 83 grants
TOP-DECILE #4,304/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH National Yang-ming…
CPC-FOCUS G06N · 12 areas
INNOV-PAR 55.8/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.8 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +8100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: National Yang-ming University (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Perceive’s 55.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 15.3 pts (27%) Velocity 16.4 pts (29%) Breadth 12.2 pts (22%) Claim depth 11.9 pts (21%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
AAC Pte · near

56
General Atomics · near

56
Movano · near

56
Perceive · this assignee

56
Zhejiang Sunny Optics · near

56
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Perceive's Innovation Score is 55.8/100 (top 7% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Perceive?

Each dot is one of Perceive’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Perceive’s own 19.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Perceive vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Perceive's grants concentrate

Perceive Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (24 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Perceive sits between National Yang-ming University and The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology.

Perceive's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Perceive Corporation moved from 24 to 59 grants (2.46x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

National Yang-min…

83
NHN

83
Newtonoid L L C

83
Oridion Medical 1…

83
Tatsuta Electric…

83
Toyota Shatai

83
The Coleman

83
The Wistar Instit…

83
Perceive ◀

83

What this shows Perceive holds 83 patents at rank #4,304, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Perceive

By rank, the assignees closest to #4,304 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Mo…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Perceive's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Perceive, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Mo…), Perceive ranks #114 of 4,479 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (56 here).

Zhejiang Sunny Optics Co., Ltd 56 General Atomics 56 AAC Technologies Pte. Ltd. 56 Movano Inc. 56

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (19.8 here).

Igus GMBH 19.8 avg Calix, Inc. 19.8 avg Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 19.8 avg NuCurrent, Inc. 19.8 avg

Perceive's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

56 Top 7% higher than 93% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Perceive Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	1	1.2%
2020	7	8.4%
2021	16	19.3%
2022	21	25.3%
2023	14	16.9%
2024	24	28.9%

Which technologies does Perceive Corporation patent most?

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 83

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 58

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 22

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 13

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 11

G11C - Static Stores 7

G02B - Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus 6

H10F - Inorganic Semiconductor Devices Sensitive TO Infrared Radiation, Light, Electromagnetic Radiation OF Shorter Wavelength OR Corpuscular Radiation 6

H03M - CODING; DECODING; Code Conversion IN General 6

G08G - Traffic Control Systems 5

G10L - Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding 2

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 1

Top 12 of 12 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Perceive Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Perceive Corporation's lead technology class is G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06N
Ranked #4,304 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Perceive Corporation against National Yang-ming University, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 55.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.