Where does Penguin Magic, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Penguin Magic, Inc. ranks #23,177 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Penguin Magic, Inc. hold?

Penguin Magic, Inc. holds 12 US utility patents granted between 2022 and 2025, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is Penguin Magic, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Penguin Magic, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 48.5 out of 100 (top 17% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Penguin Magic, Inc. focus on?

Penguin Magic, Inc.'s top technology area is A63J (Devices FOR Theatres, Circuses, OR THE LIKE; Conjuring Appliances OR THE Like) with 8 patents, ranking #7 of 61 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

Is Penguin Magic, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Penguin Magic, Inc..

What does claim depth mean for Penguin Magic, Inc.'s patents?

Penguin Magic, Inc.'s patents average 16.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Penguin Magic, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Penguin Magic, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63J (Devices FOR Theatres, Circuses, OR THE LIKE; Conjuring Appliances OR THE Like).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Penguin ranks #23,177 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 8 technology areas.

#23,177
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 17%
by Innovation Score (48.5/100): 16.0
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R23177 · US Corporation #23,177 · 12 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
MID-PACK #23,177/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Patent & Investment
CPC-NARROW A63J · 8 areas
INNOV-PAR 48.5/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Patent & Investment LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Penguin’s 48.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.9 pts (18%) Velocity 20.0 pts (41%) Breadth 10.0 pts (21%) Claim depth 9.6 pts (20%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Penguin Magic · this assignee

48
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Penguin's Innovation Score is 48.5/100 (top 17% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Penguin?

Each dot is one of Penguin’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Penguin’s own 16.0 claims/patent is at or below the 16.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Penguin vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Penguin's grants concentrate

Penguin Magic, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under A63J (Devices FOR Theatres, Circuses, OR THE LIKE; Conjuring Appliances OR THE Like). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (5 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2022. By volume, Penguin sits between Patent & Investment LLC and Petram Technologies, Inc..

Penguin's three-year grant acceleration

Penguin Magic, Inc. shows 11 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Patent & Investme…

12
Path Robotics

12
Paulson Manufactu…

12
Pendulum Therapeu…

12
Performance Indic…

12
Performance Plants

12
Pernix Sleep

12
Petram

12
Penguin Magic ◀

12

What this shows Penguin holds 12 patents at rank #23,198, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Penguin

By rank, the assignees closest to #23,198 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63J (Devices FOR Theatres)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Penguin's primary technology class.

Penguin's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

48 Top 17% higher than 83% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2022–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Penguin Magic, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2022	2	16.7%
2023	4	33.3%
2024	5	41.7%
2025partial year	1	8.3%

Which technologies does Penguin Magic, Inc. patent most?

A63J - Devices FOR Theatres, Circuses, OR THE LIKE; Conjuring Appliances OR THE Like 8

A63F - Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 5

G01G - Weighing 3

G09F - DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals 2

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 2

A44D - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Buttons, Pins, Buckles OR Slide Fasteners, AND TO Jewellery, Bracelets OR Other Personal Adornments 1

A43B - Characteristic Features OF FOOTWEAR; Parts OF Footwear 1

A43C - Fastenings OR Attachments OF FOOTWEAR; Laces IN General 1

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Penguin Magic, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Penguin Magic, Inc.'s lead technology class is A63J (Devices FOR Theatres, Circuses, OR THE LIKE; Conjuring Appliances OR THE Like), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63J
Ranked #23,177 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Penguin Magic, Inc. against Patent & Investment LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 48.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.