Where does Peak Design rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Peak Design ranks #7,605 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Peak Design hold?

Peak Design holds 43 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 14 technology areas.

What is Peak Design's Innovation Score?

Peak Design has an Innovation Score of 50.5 out of 100 (top 13% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Peak Design's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Peak Design's recent grant velocity is +136% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Peak Design's patents?

Peak Design's patents average 7.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Peak Design patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Peak Design

Q: What technology areas does Peak Design focus on?

Peak Design's top technology area is F16M (Frames, Casings OR Beds OF Engines, Machines OR Apparatus, NOT Specific TO Engines, Machines OR Apparatus Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; Supports) with 14 patents, ranking #30 of 1,330 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 14 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 43 granted patents across 14 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16M (Frames, Casings OR Beds OF Engines, Machines OR Apparatus, NOT Specific TO Engines, Machines OR Apparatus Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; Supports).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Peak ranks #7,605 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 43 patents across 14 technology areas.

#7,605
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 13%
by Innovation Score (50.5/100): 7.0
avg claims per patent: +136%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R7605 · US Corporation #7,605 · 43 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 43 grants
UPPER-Q #7,605/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Ooma
CPC-FOCUS F16M · 14 areas
INNOV-PAR 50.5/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +136% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Ooma, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Peak’s 50.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 13.1 pts (26%) Velocity 20.0 pts (40%) Breadth 13.2 pts (26%) Claim depth 4.2 pts (8%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Achronix Semiconductor · near

50
Franklin Electric · near

50
Orthosensor · near

50
Peak Design · this assignee

50
Zing Semiconductor · near

50
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Peak's Innovation Score is 50.5/100 (top 13% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Peak?

Each dot is one of Peak’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Peak’s own 7.0 claims/patent is at or below the 11.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Peak vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Peak's grants concentrate

Peak Design is a focused PatentsView assignee: 14 CPC subclasses with 32.6% of grants classified under F16M (Frames, Casings OR Beds OF Engines, Machines OR Apparatus, NOT Specific TO Engines, Machines OR Apparatus Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; Supports). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (11 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Peak sits between Opko Diagnostics, LLC and Qnap Systems, Inc..

Peak's three-year grant acceleration

Peak Design shows 21 grants in 2022–2024 against only 7 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Opko Diagnostics

43
Optis Circuit Tec…

43
Oupiin (Kunshan)

43
Ooma

43
Peak Innovations

43
Power Forest Tech…

43
Promier Products

43
Qnap Systems

43
Peak Design ◀

43

What this shows Peak holds 43 patents at rank #7,605, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Peak

By rank, the assignees closest to #7,605 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16M (Frames)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Peak's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Peak, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In F16M (Frames), Peak ranks #30 of 1,330 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (50 here).

Zing Semiconductor Corporation 50 Franklin Electric Co., Inc. 50 Achronix Semiconductor Corporation 50 Orthosensor Inc. 50

Peak's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

50 Top 13% higher than 87% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Peak Design patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	2.3%
2016	2	4.7%
2017	2	4.7%
2018	4	9.3%
2019	2	4.7%
2020	1	2.3%
2021	4	9.3%
2022	7	16.3%
2023	11	25.6%
2024	3	7.0%
2025partial year	6	14.0%

Which technologies does Peak Design patent most?

F16M - Frames, Casings OR Beds OF Engines, Machines OR Apparatus, NOT Specific TO Engines, Machines OR Apparatus Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; Supports 14

H04M - Telephonic Communication 9

G03B - Apparatus OR Arrangements FOR Taking Photographs OR FOR Projecting OR Viewing THEM; Apparatus OR Arrangements Employing Analogous Techniques Using Waves Other Than Optical WAVES; Accessories Therefor 8

H04B - Transmission 7

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 6

B60R - Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 5

F16B - Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing 5

H01F - MAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; Selection OF Materials FOR Their Magnetic Properties 4

H02J - Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy 4

A45F - Travelling OR Camp EQUIPMENT: Sacks OR Packs Carried ON THE Body 3

A45C - PURSES; LUGGAGE; Hand Carried Bags 3

B62J - Cycle Saddles OR SEATS; Auxiliary Devices OR Accessories Specially Adapted TO Cycles AND NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, e.g. Article Carriers OR Cycle Protectors 2

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 2

A44B - Buttons, Pins, Buckles, Slide Fasteners, OR THE Like 1

Top 14 of 14 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Peak Design's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Peak Design's lead technology class is F16M (Frames, Casings OR Beds OF Engines, Machines OR Apparatus, NOT Specific TO Engines, Machines OR Apparatus Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; Supports), 32.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16M
Ranked #7,605 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Peak Design against Opko Diagnostics, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 50.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.