Where does Paradigm Spine, LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Paradigm Spine, LLC ranks #12,610 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Paradigm Spine, LLC hold?

Paradigm Spine, LLC holds 24 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2023, spanning 2 technology areas.

What is Paradigm Spine, LLC's Innovation Score?

Paradigm Spine, LLC has an Innovation Score of 29.3 out of 100 (30th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Paradigm Spine, LLC focus on?

Paradigm Spine, LLC's top technology area is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification) with 22 patents, ranking #818 of 7,127 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 2 CPC subclasses total.

Is Paradigm Spine, LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Paradigm Spine, LLC's recent grant velocity is -67% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Paradigm Spine, LLC's patents?

Paradigm Spine, LLC's patents average 17.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Paradigm Spine, LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Paradigm Spine, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 24 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Paradigm ranks #12,610 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 24 patents across 2 technology areas.

#12,610
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 30th percentile
by Innovation Score (29.3/100): 17.8
avg claims per patent: -67%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R12610 · US Corporation #12,610 · 24 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 24 grants
MID-PACK #12,610/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH PagerDuty
CPC-NARROW A61B · 2 areas
INNOV-THIN 29.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.8 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -67% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: PagerDuty, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Paradigm’s 29.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.1 pts (38%) Velocity 2.5 pts (9%) Breadth 5.0 pts (17%) Claim depth 10.7 pts (37%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Honey-Can-Do… · near

29
Leapfrog Product… · near

29
Paradigm Spine · this assignee

29
Sgce · near

29
Shenzhen Leshuo… · near

29
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Paradigm's Innovation Score is 29.3/100 (30th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Paradigm?

Each dot is one of Paradigm’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Paradigm’s own 17.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Paradigm vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Paradigm's grants concentrate

Paradigm Spine, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 91.7% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, Paradigm sits between Promptu Systems Corporation and Pentel Kabushiki Kaisha.

Paradigm's three-year grant acceleration

Paradigm Spine, LLC shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 8 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Promptu Systems

24
Proximagen

24
Pulse

24
Pagerduty

24
Particles Plus

24
Pegasystems

24
Penn Engineering…

24
Pentel

24
Paradigm Spine ◀

24

What this shows Paradigm holds 24 patents at rank #12,623, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Paradigm

By rank, the assignees closest to #12,623 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Paradigm's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Paradigm, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61B (Diagnosis), Paradigm ranks #818 of 7,127 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (29 here).

Shenzhen Leshuo Technology Co., Ltd 29 Honey-Can-Do International, LLC 29 Leapfrog Product Development LLC 29 Sgce LLC 29

Paradigm's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

29 30th percentile higher than 30% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Paradigm Spine, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	12.5%
2016	4	16.7%
2017	2	8.3%
2018	4	16.7%
2019	5	20.8%
2021	3	12.5%
2022	2	8.3%
2023	1	4.2%

Which technologies does Paradigm Spine, LLC patent most?

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 22

A61F - Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive DEVICES; FOMENTATION; Treatment OR Protection OF Eyes OR EARS; Bandages, Dressings OR Absorbent PADS; Firs 12

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Paradigm Spine, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Paradigm Spine, LLC's lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 91.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
Ranked #12,610 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Paradigm Spine, LLC against Promptu Systems Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 29.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.