Where does PagerDuty, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), PagerDuty, Inc. ranks #12,609 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does PagerDuty, Inc. hold?

PagerDuty, Inc. holds 24 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2025, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is PagerDuty, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

PagerDuty, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 43.4 out of 100 (top 28% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does PagerDuty, Inc. focus on?

PagerDuty, Inc.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 15 patents, ranking #2,636 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

Is PagerDuty, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

PagerDuty, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +75% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for PagerDuty, Inc.'s patents?

PagerDuty, Inc.'s patents average 22.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the PagerDuty, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

PagerDuty, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 24 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Pagerduty ranks #12,609 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 24 patents across 7 technology areas.

#12,609
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 28%
by Innovation Score (43.4/100): 22.3
avg claims per patent: +75%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R12609 · US Corporation #12,609 · 24 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 24 grants
MID-PACK #12,609/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Paradigm Spine
CPC-NARROW G06F · 7 areas
INNOV-PAR 43.4/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 22.3 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +75% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Paradigm Spine, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Pagerduty’s 43.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.1 pts (26%) Velocity 9.5 pts (22%) Breadth 9.4 pts (22%) Claim depth 13.4 pts (31%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
PagerDuty · this assignee

43
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Pagerduty's Innovation Score is 43.4/100 (top 28% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Pagerduty?

Each dot is one of Pagerduty’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Pagerduty’s own 22.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Pagerduty vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Pagerduty's grants concentrate

PagerDuty, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 62.5% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Pagerduty sits between Primapak, LLC and Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp..

Pagerduty's three-year grant acceleration

PagerDuty, Inc. shows 10 grants in 2022–2024 against only 7 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Primapak

24
Promptu Systems

24
Proximagen

24
Pulse

24
Paradigm Spine

24
Particles Plus

24
Pegasystems

24
Penn Engineering…

24
Pagerduty ◀

24

What this shows PagerDuty holds 24 patents at rank #12,622, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near PagerDuty

By rank, the assignees closest to #12,622 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in PagerDuty's primary technology class.

Pagerduty's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

43 Top 28% higher than 72% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

PagerDuty, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	2	8.3%
2017	3	12.5%
2019	3	12.5%
2020	1	4.2%
2021	3	12.5%
2022	1	4.2%
2023	3	12.5%
2024	6	25.0%
2025partial year	2	8.3%

Which technologies does PagerDuty, Inc. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 15

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 11

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 10

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 9

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 1

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 1

G05B - Control OR Regulating Systems IN GENERAL; Functional Elements OF Such SYSTEMS; Monitoring OR Testing Arrangements FOR Such Systems OR Elements 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

PagerDuty, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

PagerDuty, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 62.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #12,609 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare PagerDuty, Inc. against Primapak, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 43.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.