Where does Optimal Plus Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Optimal Plus Ltd. ranks #14,834 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Optimal Plus Ltd. hold?

Optimal Plus Ltd. holds 20 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2025, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is Optimal Plus Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Optimal Plus Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 51.5 out of 100 (top 11% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Optimal Plus Ltd. focus on?

Optimal Plus Ltd.'s top technology area is G01R (Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables) with 12 patents, ranking #441 of 3,424 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

Is Optimal Plus Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Optimal Plus Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is +275% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Optimal Plus Ltd.'s patents?

Optimal Plus Ltd.'s patents average 21.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Optimal Plus Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Optimal Plus Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 20 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01R (Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Optimal ranks #14,834 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 20 patents across 8 technology areas.

#14,834
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 11%
by Innovation Score (51.5/100): 21.0
avg claims per patent: +275%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R14834 · Foreign Corporation #14,834 · 20 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 20 grants
MID-PACK #14,834/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Oakland University
CPC-NARROW G01R · 8 areas
INNOV-PAR 51.5/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 21.0 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +275% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Oakland University (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Optimal’s 51.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.5 pts (20%) Velocity 18.3 pts (36%) Breadth 10.0 pts (19%) Claim depth 12.6 pts (25%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Optimal Plus · this assignee

51
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Optimal's Innovation Score is 51.5/100 (top 11% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Optimal?

Each dot is one of Optimal’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Optimal’s own 21.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Optimal vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Optimal's grants concentrate

Optimal Plus Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under G01R (Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Optimal sits between Oclu Limited and Olin Corporation.

Optimal's three-year grant acceleration

Optimal Plus Ltd. shows 11 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Oclu

20
Ondavia

20
ONE Test Systems

20
Opsys Tech

20
Overland Storage

20
Oakland University

20
Ocera Therapeutics

20
Olin

20
Optimal Plus ◀

20

What this shows Optimal holds 20 patents at rank #14,825, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Optimal

By rank, the assignees closest to #14,825 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G01R (Measuring Electric Variables)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Optimal's primary technology class.

Optimal's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

51 Top 11% higher than 89% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Optimal Plus Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	5.0%
2017	1	5.0%
2018	2	10.0%
2020	1	5.0%
2021	3	15.0%
2022	3	15.0%
2023	5	25.0%
2024	3	15.0%
2025partial year	1	5.0%

Which technologies does Optimal Plus Ltd. patent most?

G01R - Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables 12

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 6

B07C - Postal SORTING; Sorting Individual Articles, OR Bulk Material FIT TO BE Sorted Piece-meal, e.g. BY Picking 6

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 5

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 4

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 3

H01L - Semiconductor Devices NOT Covered BY Class H10 3

G05B - Control OR Regulating Systems IN GENERAL; Functional Elements OF Such SYSTEMS; Monitoring OR Testing Arrangements FOR Such Systems OR Elements 2

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Optimal Plus Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Optimal Plus Ltd.'s lead technology class is G01R (Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01R
Ranked #14,834 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Optimal Plus Ltd. against Oclu Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 51.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.