USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Oldenburg Group Incorporated

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F42D (Blasting).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Oldenburg ranks #20,192 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 3 technology areas.

#20,192
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
4th percentile
by Innovation Score (16.9/100)
2.4
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R20192 · US Corporation #20,192 · 14 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
  • MID-PACK #20,192/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Oddello Industries
  • CPC-NARROW F42D · 3 areas
  • INNOV-LOW 16.9/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 2.4 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Oddello Industries, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Oldenburg’s 16.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Oldenburg

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Oldenburg's Innovation Score is 16.9/100 (4th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Oldenburg?

Each dot is one of Oldenburg’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Oldenburg’s own 2.4 claims/patent is at or below the 15.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Oldenburg vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 13.913.91414.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Oval Medical Technologies Limited - 14, 16.29Oval MedicalOxos Medical, Inc. - 14, 15.86Oxos MedicalOddello Industries, LLC - 14, 8.71Oddello IndustriesOdyssey Wireless, Inc. - 14, 27.79Odyssey WirelessOmniEarth, Inc. - 14, 18.36OmniearthOn Point Ball Marker LLC - 14, 2On Point Ball Mar…Oncoceutics, Inc. - 14, 11.29OncoceuticsOne Drop Biosensor Technologies, LLC - 14, 26.71One Drop BiosensorOldenburg Group Incorporated - 14, 2.36Oldenburg Group I…
Oldenburg vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Oldenburg's grants concentrate

Oldenburg Group Incorporated is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 7.1% of grants classified under F42D (Blasting). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Oldenburg sits between Oval Medical Technologies Limited and One Drop Biosensor Technologies, LLC.

Who files at Oldenburg's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Oldenburg holds 14 patents at rank #20,200, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Oldenburg

By rank, the assignees closest to #20,200 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F42D (Blasting)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Oldenburg's primary technology class.

Oldenburg's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

17 4th percentile higher than 4% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

012345 20152016201720182025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Oldenburg Group Incorporated patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 4 28.6%
2016 2 14.3%
2017 4 28.6%
2018 3 21.4%
2025partial year 1 7.1%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Oldenburg Group Incorporated's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Oldenburg Group Incorporated's lead technology class is F42D (Blasting), 7.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F42D
  • Ranked #20,192 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Oldenburg Group Incorporated against Oval Medical Technologies Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 16.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.