Oldenburg Group Incorporated
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F42D (Blasting).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Oldenburg ranks #20,192 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #20,192
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 4th percentile
- by Innovation Score (16.9/100)
- 2.4
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R20192 · US Corporation #20,192 · 14 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
- MID-PACK #20,192/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Oddello Industries
- CPC-NARROW F42D · 3 areas
- INNOV-LOW 16.9/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 2.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Oddello Industries, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Oldenburg’s 16.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Oldenburg
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Oldenburg Group… · this assignee 17
Oldenburg Group… · this assignee
17 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Oldenburg's Innovation Score is 16.9/100 (4th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Oldenburg?
Each dot is one of Oldenburg’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Oldenburg’s own 2.4 claims/patent is at or below the 15.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Oldenburg's grants concentrate
Oldenburg Group Incorporated is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 7.1% of grants classified under F42D (Blasting). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Oldenburg sits between Oval Medical Technologies Limited and One Drop Biosensor Technologies, LLC.
Who files at Oldenburg's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Oval Medical
Oval Medical Technologies Limited
14 patents
- Oxos Medical
Oxos Medical, Inc.
14 patents
- Oddello Industries
Oddello Industries, LLC
14 patents
- Odyssey Wireless
Odyssey Wireless, Inc.
14 patents
- Omniearth
OmniEarth, Inc.
14 patents
- On Point Ball Mar…
On Point Ball Marker LLC
14 patents
- Oncoceutics
Oncoceutics, Inc.
14 patents
- One Drop Biosensor
One Drop Biosensor Technologies, LLC
14 patents
- Oldenburg Group I… ◀
Oldenburg Group Incorporated
14 patents
What this shows Oldenburg holds 14 patents at rank #20,200, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Oldenburg
By rank, the assignees closest to #20,200 in granted patent volume.
- Oval Medical Technologies Limited #20,196 · 14 patents
- Oxos Medical, Inc. #20,197 · 14 patents
- Oddello Industries, LLC #20,198 · 14 patents
- Odyssey Wireless, Inc. #20,199 · 14 patents
- OmniEarth, Inc. #20,201 · 14 patents
- On Point Ball Marker LLC #20,202 · 14 patents
- Oncoceutics, Inc. #20,203 · 14 patents
- One Drop Biosensor Technologies, LLC #20,204 · 14 patents
Leaders in F42D (Blasting)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Oldenburg's primary technology class.
Oldenburg's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
17 4th percentile higher than 4% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 28.6% |
| 2016 | 2 | 14.3% |
| 2017 | 4 | 28.6% |
| 2018 | 3 | 21.4% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 7.1% |
Which technologies does Oldenburg Group Incorporated patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Oldenburg Group Incorporated's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Oldenburg Group Incorporated's lead technology class is F42D (Blasting), 7.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F42D
- Ranked #20,192 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Oldenburg Group Incorporated against Oval Medical Technologies Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 16.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.