Where does OCM Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), OCM Inc. ranks #23,119 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does OCM Inc. hold?

OCM Inc. holds 12 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is OCM Inc.'s Innovation Score?

OCM Inc. has an Innovation Score of 37.8 out of 100 (top 43% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does OCM Inc. focus on?

OCM Inc.'s top technology area is E04C (Structural ELEMENTS; Building Materials) with 3 patents, ranking #157 of 492 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is OCM Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

OCM Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +900% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for OCM Inc.'s patents?

OCM Inc.'s patents average 6.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the OCM Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

OCM Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E04C (Structural ELEMENTS; Building Materials).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, OCM ranks #23,119 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 4 technology areas.

#23,119
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 43%
by Innovation Score (37.8/100): 6.8
avg claims per patent: +900%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R23119 · US Corporation #23,119 · 12 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
MID-PACK #23,119/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Numab Therapeutics
CPC-NARROW E04C · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 37.8/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.8 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +900% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Numab Therapeutics AG (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How OCM’s 37.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.9 pts (23%) Velocity 17.8 pts (47%) Breadth 7.1 pts (19%) Claim depth 4.1 pts (11%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
American Vehicular… · near

38
ID me · near

38
OCM · this assignee

38
Rexnord Flattop… · near

38
Think Laboratory · near

38
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows OCM's Innovation Score is 37.8/100 (top 43% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for OCM?

Each dot is one of OCM’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). OCM’s own 6.8 claims/patent is at or below the 13.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

OCM vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where OCM's grants concentrate

OCM Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 25% of grants classified under E04C (Structural ELEMENTS; Building Materials). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, OCM sits between Numab Therapeutics AG and ONE Concern, Inc..

OCM's three-year grant acceleration

OCM Inc. shows 8 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Numab Therapeutics

12
Nura Holdings Pty

12
Nxera Pharma UK

12
Obschestvo S Ogra…

12
Officine Maccafer…

12
Oleon

12
Omnimax Internati…

12
ONE Concern

12
OCM ◀

12

What this shows OCM holds 12 patents at rank #23,111, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near OCM

By rank, the assignees closest to #23,111 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in E04C (Structural Elements)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in OCM's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for OCM, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In E04C (Structural Elements), OCM ranks #157 of 492 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (38 here).

American Vehicular Sciences LLC 38 ID.me, Inc. 38 Rexnord Flattop Europe B.V. 38 Think Laboratory Co., Ltd. 38

OCM's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

38 Top 43% higher than 57% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

OCM Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	1	8.3%
2020	2	16.7%
2022	2	16.7%
2023	3	25.0%
2024	3	25.0%
2025partial year	1	8.3%

Which technologies does OCM Inc. patent most?

E04C - Structural ELEMENTS; Building Materials 3

E01C - Construction OF, OR Surfaces FOR, Roads, Sports Grounds, OR THE LIKE; Machines OR Auxiliary Tools FOR Construction OR Repair 1

E01D - Construction OF Bridges, ; Elevated ROADWAYS; OR VIADUCTS; Assembly OF Bridges 1

E04G - SCAFFOLDING; FORMS; SHUTTERING; Building Implements OR Aids, OR Their USE; Handling Building Materials ON THE SITE; Repairing, Breaking-up OR Other Work ON Existing Buildings 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

OCM Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

OCM Inc.'s lead technology class is E04C (Structural ELEMENTS; Building Materials), 25% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E04C
Ranked #23,119 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare OCM Inc. against Numab Therapeutics AG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 37.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.