Where does ID.me, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), ID.me, Inc. ranks #19,887 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does ID.me, Inc. hold?

ID.me, Inc. holds 14 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2025, spanning 2 technology areas.

What is ID.me, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

ID.me, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 37.8 out of 100 (top 43% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does ID.me, Inc. focus on?

ID.me, Inc.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 14 patents, ranking #2,788 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 2 CPC subclasses total.

Is ID.me, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

ID.me, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +400% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for ID.me, Inc.'s patents?

ID.me, Inc.'s patents average 19.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the ID.me, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

ID.me, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Id.me ranks #19,887 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 2 technology areas.

#19,887
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 43%
by Innovation Score (37.8/100): 19.6
avg claims per patent: +400%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R19887 · US Corporation #19,887 · 14 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
MID-PACK #19,887/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH I Chih Shivan…
CPC-NARROW G06F · 2 areas
INNOV-THIN 37.8/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +400% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: I Chih Shivan Enterprise Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Id.me’s 37.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.4 pts (25%) Velocity 11.7 pts (31%) Breadth 5.0 pts (13%) Claim depth 11.8 pts (31%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
American Vehicular… · near

38
ID me · this assignee

38
OCM · near

38
Rexnord Flattop… · near

38
Think Laboratory · near

38
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Id.me's Innovation Score is 37.8/100 (top 43% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Id.me?

Each dot is one of Id.me’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Id.me’s own 19.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Id.me vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Id.me's grants concentrate

ID.me, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Id.me sits between I Chih Shivan Enterprise Co., Ltd. and IMI Hydronic Engineering International SA.

Id.me's three-year grant acceleration

ID.me, Inc. shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

I Chih Shivan Ent…

14
I-V Access Techno…

14
I R I S

14
I/O Controls

14
Idec

14
IIX

14
Illumisonics

14
IMI Hydronic Engi…

14
ID me ◀

14

What this shows ID.me holds 14 patents at rank #19,885, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near IDme

By rank, the assignees closest to #19,885 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in IDme's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for IDme, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), IDme ranks #2,788 of 13,878 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (38 here).

American Vehicular Sciences LLC 38 OCM Inc. 38 Rexnord Flattop Europe B.V. 38 Think Laboratory Co., Ltd. 38

Id.me's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

38 Top 43% higher than 57% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

ID.me, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	1	7.1%
2019	1	7.1%
2020	1	7.1%
2021	2	14.3%
2022	2	14.3%
2023	3	21.4%
2024	2	14.3%
2025partial year	2	14.3%

Which technologies does ID.me, Inc. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 14

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 14

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

ID.me, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

ID.me, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #19,887 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare ID.me, Inc. against I Chih Shivan Enterprise Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 37.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.