Where does Oakwood Energy Management, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Oakwood Energy Management, Inc. ranks #42,063 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Oakwood Energy Management, Inc. hold?

Oakwood Energy Management, Inc. holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2020, spanning 11 technology areas.

What is Oakwood Energy Management, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Oakwood Energy Management, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 29.3 out of 100 (30th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Oakwood Energy Management, Inc. focus on?

Oakwood Energy Management, Inc.'s top technology area is F16F (SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration) with 4 patents, ranking #177 of 892 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 11 CPC subclasses total.

Is Oakwood Energy Management, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Oakwood Energy Management, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -80% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Oakwood Energy Management, Inc.'s patents?

Oakwood Energy Management, Inc.'s patents average 18.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Oakwood Energy Management, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Oakwood Energy Management, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16F (SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Oakwood ranks #42,063 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 11 technology areas.

#42,063
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 30th percentile
by Innovation Score (29.3/100): 18.0
avg claims per patent: -80%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R42063 · US Corporation #42,063 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #42,063/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH O-flexx
CPC-FOCUS F16F · 11 areas
INNOV-THIN 29.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -80% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: O-flexx Technologies GMBH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Oakwood’s 29.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (23%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 11.7 pts (40%) Claim depth 10.8 pts (37%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Oakwood Energy… · this assignee

29
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Oakwood's Innovation Score is 29.3/100 (30th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Oakwood?

Each dot is one of Oakwood’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Oakwood’s own 18.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Oakwood vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Oakwood's grants concentrate

Oakwood Energy Management, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under F16F (SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Oakwood sits between O'keeffe's, Inc. and OE Wheel Works, LLC.

O'keeffe's

6
O-flexx

6
O-net Wavetouch

6
O-view Technology

6
OAM Photonics

6
Obrizum Group

6
Ocon Medical

6
OE Wheel Works

6
Oakwood Energy Ma… ◀

6

What this shows Oakwood holds 6 patents at rank #42,036, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Oakwood

By rank, the assignees closest to #42,036 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16F (Springs)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Oakwood's primary technology class.

Oakwood's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

29 30th percentile higher than 30% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Oakwood Energy Management, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	16.7%
2016	3	50.0%
2017	1	16.7%
2020	1	16.7%

Which technologies does Oakwood Energy Management, Inc. patent most?

F16F - SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration 4

B60R - Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 4

A42B - HATS; Head Coverings 2

A41D - OUTERWEAR; Protective GARMENTS; Accessories 1

A42C - Manufacturing OR Trimming Head Coverings, e.g. Hats 1

B60N - Seats Specially Adapted FOR VEHICLES; Vehicle Passenger Accommodation NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

B29L - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles 1

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 1

B62D - Motor VEHICLES; Trailers 1

B29K - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses B29b, B29c OR B29d, Relating TO Moulding Materials OR TO Materials FOR ; Moulds, ; Reinforcements, Fillers OR Preformed Parts, e.g. Inserts 1

Top 11 of 11 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Oakwood Energy Management, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Oakwood Energy Management, Inc.'s lead technology class is F16F (SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16F
Ranked #42,063 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Oakwood Energy Management, Inc. against O'keeffe's, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 29.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.