Overall rank by patents
#42,034
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 5 technology areas, active 2015–2017. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING).
The verdict
O-net holds 6 US patents across 5 technology areas, rank #42,034 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
O-net Wavetouch Limited has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2015 and 2017, placing O-net Wavetouch Limited at rank #42,034 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 5 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 21.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in G06F (ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING). As a Foreign Corporation, O-net Wavetouch Limited is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, O-net sits between Nykode Therapeutics ASA (6 patents, rank #42,030) and Obrizum Group Ltd. (6 patents, rank #42,038) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 27.2/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 6 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. O-net Wavetouch Limited's 21.0 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while concentration in 5 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark O-net Wavetouch Limited against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Nykode Therapeutics ASA
6 patents
O'BRIEN HOLDING CO., INC.
6 patents
O'KEEFFE'S, INC.
6 patents
O-FLEXX TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
6 patents
O-VIEW TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
6 patents
OAKWOOD ENERGY MANAGEMENT, INC.
6 patents
OAM Photonics LLC
6 patents
OBRIZUM GROUP LTD.
6 patents
O-Net WaveTouch Limited
6 patents
What this shows O-net holds 6 patents at rank #42,034, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #42,034 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in O-net's primary technology class.
O-net's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 Top 77% higher than 23% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 66.7% |
| 2016 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#42,034
Across all tracked assignees
27.2 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
O-net's 6 grants land it in the top 77% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.