Nutrition Sciences N.V.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A23K (Fodder).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Nutrition ranks #42,050 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #42,050
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 32nd percentile
- by Innovation Score (29.7/100)
- 11.7
- avg claims per patent
- +100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R42050 · Foreign Corporation #42,050 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #42,050/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Nabholz Construction
- CPC-NARROW A23K · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 29.7/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 11.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Nabholz Construction Corporation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Nutrition’s 29.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Nutrition
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Nutrition Sciences · this assignee 30
Nutrition Sciences · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Nutrition's Innovation Score is 29.7/100 (32nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Nutrition?
Each dot is one of Nutrition’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Nutrition’s own 11.7 claims/patent is at or below the 11.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Nutrition's grants concentrate
Nutrition Sciences N.V. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A23K (Fodder). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Nutrition sits between Nucelis LLC and Nabholz Construction Corporation.
Nutrition's three-year grant acceleration
Nutrition Sciences N.V. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Nutrition's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Nucelis
Nucelis LLC
6 patents
- Numascale AS
Numascale AS
6 patents
- Nuovo Film
Nuovo Film Inc.
6 patents
- Nustorage Technol…
Nustorage Technology Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- NXT Generation
NXT Generation, LLC
6 patents
- NY State Psychiat…
NY State Psychiatric Institute
6 patents
- NZ
NZ Technologies Inc.
6 patents
- Nabholz Construct…
Nabholz Construction Corporation
6 patents
- Nutrition Sciences ◀
Nutrition Sciences N.V.
6 patents
What this shows Nutrition holds 6 patents at rank #41,924, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Nutrition
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,924 in granted patent volume.
- Nucelis LLC #41,920 · 6 patents
- Numascale AS #41,921 · 6 patents
- Nuovo Film Inc. #41,922 · 6 patents
- Nustorage Technology Co., Ltd. #41,923 · 6 patents
- NXT Generation, LLC #41,925 · 6 patents
- NY State Psychiatric Institute #41,926 · 6 patents
- NZ Technologies Inc. #41,927 · 6 patents
- Nabholz Construction Corporation #41,928 · 6 patents
Leaders in A23K (Fodder)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Nutrition's primary technology class.
Nutrition's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 32nd percentile higher than 32% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2022 | 2 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does Nutrition Sciences N.V. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Nutrition Sciences N.V.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Nutrition Sciences N.V.'s lead technology class is A23K (Fodder), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A23K
- Ranked #42,050 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Nutrition Sciences N.V. against Nucelis LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 29.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.