Overall rank by patents
#24,837
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 10 technology areas, active 2021–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: E03C (DOMESTIC PLUMBING INSTALLATIONS FOR FRESH WATER OR WASTE WATER ; SINKS).
The verdict
NCIP holds 11 US patents across 10 technology areas, rank #24,837 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
NCIP Inc. has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2021 and 2025, placing NCIP Inc. at rank #24,837 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 10 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 7.5 claims per patent with primary concentration in E03C (DOMESTIC PLUMBING INSTALLATIONS FOR FRESH WATER OR WASTE WATER ; SINKS). As a Foreign Corporation, NCIP Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, NCIP sits between National Guard Products, Inc. (11 patents, rank #24,833) and Neooto Co., Ltd. (11 patents, rank #24,841) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 44.2/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2021 through 2025, with 11 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. NCIP Inc.'s 7.5 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 10 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark NCIP Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
NATIONAL GUARD PRODUCTS, INC.
11 patents
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH)
11 patents
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SHIGA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
11 patents
NATIVE INSTRUMENTS GMBH
11 patents
NCM INNOVATIONS (PTY) LTD
11 patents
NDM TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
11 patents
NEOCIS INC.
11 patents
NEOOTO CO., LTD.
11 patents
NCIP INC.
11 patents
What this shows NCIP holds 11 patents at rank #24,837, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
NCIP's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
44 Top 26% higher than 74% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2022 | 4 | 36.4% |
| 2023 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2024 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2025 | 1 | 9.1% |
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#24,837
Across all tracked assignees
44.2 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
NCIP's 11 grants land it in the top 26% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.