PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

National Guard Products, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 5 technology areas, active 2021–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: E06B (FIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
11
Total patents granted
5
CPC technology areas
10.1
Avg claims per patent
-
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

National holds 11 US patents across 5 technology areas, rank #24,833 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#24,833
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 30%
by Innovation Score (42.5/100)
10.1
avg claims per patent

Portfolio overview

National Guard Products, Inc. has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2021 and 2025, placing National Guard Products, Inc. at rank #24,833 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 5 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 10.1 claims per patent with primary concentration in E06B (FIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES). As a US Corporation, National Guard Products, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, National sits between Nanjing Yanchang Reaction Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd. (11 patents, rank #24,829) and NCIP Inc. (11 patents, rank #24,837) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 42.5/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2021 through 2025, with 11 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. National Guard Products, Inc.'s 10.1 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 5 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark National Guard Products, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

Who files at National's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows National holds 11 patents at rank #24,833, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

National's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

43 Top 30% higher than 70% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0123456 20212022202320242025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2021–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
National Guard Products, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2021 1 9.1%
2022 5 45.5%
2023 1 9.1%
2024 3 27.3%
2025 1 9.1%

Which technologies does National Guard Products, Inc. patent most?

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Focused
Claim Depth Simple

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#24,833

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

42.5 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does National Guard Products, Inc. hold?
National Guard Products, Inc. holds 11 US granted patents filed between 2021 and 2025, spanning 5 technology areas.
What is National Guard Products, Inc.'s Innovation Score?
National Guard Products, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 42.5 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does National Guard Products, Inc. focus on?
National Guard Products, Inc.'s top technology area is E06B (FIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES) with 6 patents. The company has filed patents in 5 CPC subclasses total.
Is National Guard Products, Inc.'s patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for National Guard Products, Inc..
What does claim depth mean for National Guard Products, Inc.'s patents?
National Guard Products, Inc.'s patents average 10.1 claims each. This is relatively simple claim structure, typical for focused inventions.
How is the National Guard Products, Inc. patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

National's 11 grants land it in the top 30% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - National ranks #24,833 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in E06B - see who else leads that technology area. E06B leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.