Where does Nanograf Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Nanograf Corporation ranks #24,844 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Nanograf Corporation hold?

Nanograf Corporation holds 11 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2024, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is Nanograf Corporation's Innovation Score?

Nanograf Corporation has an Innovation Score of 32.5 out of 100 (41st percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Nanograf Corporation focus on?

Nanograf Corporation's top technology area is H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy) with 11 patents, ranking #489 of 2,332 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

Is Nanograf Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Nanograf Corporation.

What does claim depth mean for Nanograf Corporation's patents?

Nanograf Corporation's patents average 16.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Nanograf Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Nanograf Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Nanograf ranks #24,844 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 6 technology areas.

#24,844
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 41st percentile
by Innovation Score (32.5/100): 16.2
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R24844 · US Corporation #24,844 · 11 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
MID-PACK #24,844/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Nabors LUX 2 Sarl
CPC-NARROW H01M · 6 areas
INNOV-THIN 32.5/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.2 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2020–2024 · 5y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Nabors LUX 2 Sarl (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Nanograf’s 32.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.6 pts (26%) Velocity 5.6 pts (17%) Breadth 8.7 pts (27%) Claim depth 9.7 pts (30%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Nanograf · this assignee

33
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Nanograf's Innovation Score is 32.5/100 (41st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Nanograf?

Each dot is one of Nanograf’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Nanograf’s own 16.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Nanograf vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Nanograf's grants concentrate

Nanograf Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2023. By volume, Nanograf sits between Nabors LUX 2 Sarl and National Institutes OF Health (NIH).

Nanograf's three-year grant acceleration

Nanograf Corporation shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Nabors LUX 2 Sarl

11
Namecheap

11
Nanhua Intelligen…

11
Nanjing Yanchang…

11
National Center F…

11
National Dong HWA…

11
National Guard Pr…

11
National Institut…

11
Nanograf ◀

11

What this shows Nanograf holds 11 patents at rank #24,830, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Nanograf

By rank, the assignees closest to #24,830 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H01M (Processes OR Means)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Nanograf's primary technology class.

Nanograf's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 41st percentile higher than 41% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Nanograf Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	3	27.3%
2021	3	27.3%
2023	2	18.2%
2024	3	27.3%

Which technologies does Nanograf Corporation patent most?

H01M - Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy 11

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 11

C01B - Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c 4

Y02T - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation 3

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 2

C01P - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Structural AND Physical Aspects OF Solid Inorganic Compounds 2

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Nanograf Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Nanograf Corporation's lead technology class is H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01M
Ranked #24,844 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Nanograf Corporation against Nabors LUX 2 Sarl, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 32.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.