Nanoholdings, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 20 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Nanoholdings ranks #24,845 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 20 technology areas.
- #24,845
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 38%
- by Innovation Score (39.4/100)
- 35.9
- avg claims per patent
- -78%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R24845 · US Corporation #24,845 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
- MID-PACK #24,845/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Naiad Maritime Group
- CPC-FOCUS H10K · 20 areas
- INNOV-THIN 39.4/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 35.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -78% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Naiad Maritime Group, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Nanoholdings’s 39.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Nanoholdings
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Nanoholdings · this assignee
Nanoholdings · this assignee
39 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Nanoholdings's Innovation Score is 39.4/100 (top 38% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Nanoholdings?
Each dot is one of Nanoholdings’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Nanoholdings’s own 35.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 18.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Nanoholdings's grants concentrate
Nanoholdings, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 20 CPC subclasses with 81.8% of grants classified under H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Nanoholdings sits between Nuwellis, Inc. and Neone, Inc..
Who files at Nanoholdings's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Nuwellis
Nuwellis, Inc.
11 patents
- Nxgn Data
Nxgn Data, Inc.
11 patents
- Nymi
Nymi Inc.
11 patents
- Naiad Maritime Gr…
Naiad Maritime Group, Inc.
11 patents
- Nanophase
Nanophase Technologies Corporation
11 patents
- Naturex
Naturex Inc.
11 patents
- Nayya Health
Nayya Health, Inc.
11 patents
- Neone
Neone, Inc.
11 patents
- Nanoholdings ◀
Nanoholdings, LLC
11 patents
What this shows Nanoholdings holds 11 patents at rank #24,877, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Nanoholdings
By rank, the assignees closest to #24,877 in granted patent volume.
- Nuwellis, Inc. #24,873 · 11 patents
- Nxgn Data, Inc. #24,874 · 11 patents
- Nymi Inc. #24,875 · 11 patents
- Naiad Maritime Group, Inc. #24,876 · 11 patents
- Nanophase Technologies Corporation #24,878 · 11 patents
- Naturex Inc. #24,879 · 11 patents
- Nayya Health, Inc. #24,880 · 11 patents
- Neone, Inc. #24,881 · 11 patents
Leaders in H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Nanoholdings's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 12,550 in class
- BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. 4,700 in class
- LG Display Co., Ltd. 3,613 in class
- Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. 2,381 in class
- Chengdu BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. 1,241 in class
- Japan Display Inc. 1,176 in class
- Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology Co., Ltd. 1,105 in class
- Universal Display Corporation 1,023 in class
Nanoholdings's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
39 Top 38% higher than 62% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2016 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2018 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2019 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2020 | 2 | 18.2% |
Which technologies does Nanoholdings, LLC patent most?
Top 15 of 20 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Nanoholdings, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Nanoholdings, LLC's lead technology class is H10K (Organic Electric Solid-state Devices), 81.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H10K
- Ranked #24,845 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Nanoholdings, LLC against Nuwellis, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 39.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.