USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 38 granted patents across 15 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61L (Methods OR Apparatus FOR Sterilising Materials OR Objects IN GENERAL; Disinfection, Sterilisation OR Deodorisation OF AIR; Chemical Aspects OF Bandages, Dressings, Absorbent Pads OR Surgical ARTICLES;).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Musculoskeletal ranks #8,446 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 38 patents across 15 technology areas.

#8,446
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 37%
by Innovation Score (40.1/100)
14.4
avg claims per patent
+200%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R8446 · US Corporation #8,446 · 38 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 38 grants
  • UPPER-Q #8,446/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Micronas
  • CPC-FOCUS A61L · 15 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 40.1/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 14.4 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-SURGE +200% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Micronas GmbH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Musculoskeletal’s 40.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Musculoskeletal

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Musculoskeletal's Innovation Score is 40.1/100 (top 37% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Musculoskeletal?

Each dot is one of Musculoskeletal’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Musculoskeletal’s own 14.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Musculoskeletal vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 37.938.038.03838.038.038.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Micronas GmbH - 38, 14.03MicronasMikron Industries, Inc. - 38, 1.45Mikron IndustriesMinimax GmbH & Co KG - 38, 16.21Minimax & KGMorpho Detection, LLC - 38, 19.08Morpho DetectionNalux Co., Ltd. - 38, 8.95NaluxNational Center OF Neurology AND Psychiatry - 38, 9.89National Center O…Nidec Copal Electronics Corporation - 38, 9.87Nidec CopalNippon Chemiphar Co., Ltd. - 38, 19.39Nippon ChemipharMusculoskeletal Transplant Foundation - 38, 14.37Musculoskeletal T…
Musculoskeletal vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Musculoskeletal's grants concentrate

Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 15 CPC subclasses with 71.1% of grants classified under A61L (Methods OR Apparatus FOR Sterilising Materials OR Objects IN GENERAL; Disinfection, Sterilisation OR Deodorisation OF AIR; Chemical Aspects OF Bandages, Dressings, Absorbent Pads OR Surgical ARTICLES;). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Musculoskeletal sits between Micronas GmbH and Nippon Chemiphar Co., Ltd..

Musculoskeletal's three-year grant acceleration

Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation shows 13 grants in 2022–2024 against only 17 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Musculoskeletal's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Musculoskeletal holds 38 patents at rank #8,446, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Musculoskeletal

By rank, the assignees closest to #8,446 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61L (Methods OR Apparatus FOR Sterilising Materials OR Objects…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Musculoskeletal's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Musculoskeletal, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61L (Methods OR Apparatus FOR Sterilising Materials OR Objects…), Musculoskeletal ranks #101 of 2,589 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Musculoskeletal's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

40 Top 37% higher than 63% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 2015201620182019202020212022202320242025 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 2 5.3%
2016 1 2.6%
2018 3 7.9%
2019 3 7.9%
2020 7 18.4%
2021 7 18.4%
2022 4 10.5%
2023 7 18.4%
2024 2 5.3%
2025partial year 2 5.3%

Which technologies does Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation patent most?

Top 15 of 15 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation's lead technology class is A61L (Methods OR Apparatus FOR Sterilising Materials OR Objects IN GENERAL; Disinfection, Sterilisation OR Deodorisation OF AIR; Chemical Aspects OF Bandages, Dressings, Absorbent Pads OR Surgical ARTICLES;), 71.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61L
  • Ranked #8,446 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation against Micronas GmbH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 40.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.