Where does Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc. ranks #41,787 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc. hold?

Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc. holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2023, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 24.4 out of 100 (15th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc. focus on?

Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc.'s top technology area is F02K (Jet-propulsion Plants) with 5 patents, ranking #60 of 163 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc..

What does claim depth mean for Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc.'s patents?

Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc.'s patents average 12.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc.

Q: How is the Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F02K (Jet-propulsion Plants).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Mountain ranks #41,787 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 4 technology areas.

#41,787
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 15th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.4/100): 12.2
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R41787 · US Corporation #41,787 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #41,787/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Moog Unna
CPC-NARROW F02K · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 24.4/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.2 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2020–2023 · 4y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Moog Unna GmbH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Mountain’s 24.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (27%) Velocity 3.3 pts (14%) Breadth 7.1 pts (29%) Claim depth 7.3 pts (30%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Mountain Aerospace… · this assignee

24
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Mountain's Innovation Score is 24.4/100 (15th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Mountain?

Each dot is one of Mountain’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Mountain’s own 12.2 claims/patent is at or below the 14.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Mountain vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Mountain's grants concentrate

Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under F02K (Jet-propulsion Plants). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Mountain sits between Moog Unna GmbH and Mullet Tools, LLC.

Mountain's three-year grant acceleration

Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Moog Unna

6
Morton Buildings

6
Mosaic Manufactur…

6
Mostar Directional

6
Movik Networks

6
Mrspeakers

6
Mtelligence

6
Mullet Tools

6
Mountain Aerospac… ◀

6

What this shows Mountain holds 6 patents at rank #41,791, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Mountain

By rank, the assignees closest to #41,791 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F02K (Jet-propulsion Plants)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Mountain's primary technology class.

Mountain's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 15th percentile higher than 15% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	1	16.7%
2021	3	50.0%
2022	1	16.7%
2023	1	16.7%

Which technologies does Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc. patent most?

F02K - Jet-propulsion Plants 5

F23R - Generating Combustion Products OF High Pressure OR High Velocity, e.g. Gas-turbine Combustion Chambers 2

F05D - Indexing Scheme FOR Aspects Relating TO Non-positive-displacement Machines OR Engines, Gas-turbines OR Jet-propulsion Plants 1

Y02T - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc.'s lead technology class is F02K (Jet-propulsion Plants), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F02K
Ranked #41,787 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Mountain Aerospace Research Solutions, Inc. against Moog Unna GmbH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 24.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.