Mondi Gronau GmbH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Mondi ranks #41,766 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 12 technology areas.
- #41,766
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 16th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.1/100)
- 10.2
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R41766 · Foreign Corporation #41,766 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #41,766/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Mol Betting Systems
- CPC-FOCUS B32B · 12 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.1/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 10.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Mol Betting Systems, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Mondi’s 25.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Mondi
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Mondi Gronau · this assignee 25
Mondi Gronau · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Mondi's Innovation Score is 25.1/100 (16th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Mondi?
Each dot is one of Mondi’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Mondi’s own 10.2 claims/patent is at or below the 14.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Mondi's grants concentrate
Mondi Gronau GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Mondi sits between Mol Betting Systems, Inc. and Moog Unna GmbH.
Who files at Mondi's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Mol Betting Syste…
Mol Betting Systems, Inc.
6 patents
- Molecular Loop Bi…
Molecular Loop Biosolutions, LLC
6 patents
- Momentum Bioscien…
Momentum Bioscience Limited
6 patents
- Monarch Specialty…
Monarch Specialty Group, Inc.
6 patents
- Monsarrat
Monsarrat, Inc.
6 patents
- Montana Technolog…
Montana Technological University
6 patents
- Montefibre Mae S…
Montefibre Mae Technologies S.r.l.
6 patents
- Moog Unna
Moog Unna GmbH
6 patents
- Mondi Gronau ◀
Mondi Gronau GmbH
6 patents
What this shows Mondi holds 6 patents at rank #41,783, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Mondi
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,783 in granted patent volume.
- Mol Betting Systems, Inc. #41,779 · 6 patents
- Molecular Loop Biosolutions, LLC #41,780 · 6 patents
- Momentum Bioscience Limited #41,781 · 6 patents
- Monarch Specialty Group, Inc. #41,782 · 6 patents
- Monsarrat, Inc. #41,784 · 6 patents
- Montana Technological University #41,785 · 6 patents
- Montefibre Mae Technologies S.r.l. #41,786 · 6 patents
- Moog Unna GmbH #41,787 · 6 patents
Leaders in B32B (Layered Products)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Mondi's primary technology class.
Mondi's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 16th percentile higher than 16% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2016 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 2 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does Mondi Gronau GmbH patent most?
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Mondi Gronau GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Mondi Gronau GmbH's lead technology class is B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B32B
- Ranked #41,766 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Mondi Gronau GmbH against Mol Betting Systems, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.