Where does MOJ.IO, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), MOJ.IO, Inc. ranks #11,737 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does MOJ.IO, Inc. hold?

MOJ.IO, Inc. holds 26 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 29 technology areas.

What is MOJ.IO, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

MOJ.IO, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 45.6 out of 100 (top 23% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is MOJ.IO, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

MOJ.IO, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +0% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for MOJ.IO, Inc.'s patents?

MOJ.IO, Inc.'s patents average 17.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the MOJ.IO, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

MOJ.IO, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does MOJ.IO, Inc. focus on?

MOJ.IO, Inc.'s top technology area is G07C (Time OR Attendance REGISTERS; Registering OR Indicating THE Working OF MACHINES; Generating Random NUMBERS; Voting OR Lottery APPARATUS; Arrangements, Systems OR Apparatus FOR Checking NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere) with 16 patents, ranking #123 of 1,508 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 29 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 26 granted patents across 29 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G07C (Time OR Attendance REGISTERS; Registering OR Indicating THE Working OF MACHINES; Generating Random NUMBERS; Voting OR Lottery APPARATUS; Arrangements, Systems OR Apparatus FOR Checking NOT Provided FO).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Moj.io ranks #11,737 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 26 patents across 29 technology areas.

#11,737
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 23%
by Innovation Score (45.6/100): 17.9
avg claims per patent: +0%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R11737 · Foreign Corporation #11,737 · 26 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 26 grants
UPPER-Q #11,737/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Mad Apparel
CPC-FOCUS G07C · 29 areas
INNOV-PAR 45.6/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.9 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-FLAT +0% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Mad Apparel, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Moj.io’s 45.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.4 pts (25%) Velocity 4.4 pts (10%) Breadth 19.0 pts (42%) Claim depth 10.7 pts (24%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Evonik · near

46
LS Automotive · near

46
Luna Innovations… · near

46
MOJ IO · this assignee

46
Ravin Crossbows · near

46
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Moj.io's Innovation Score is 45.6/100 (top 23% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Moj.io?

Each dot is one of Moj.io’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Moj.io’s own 17.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Moj.io vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Moj.io's grants concentrate

MOJ.IO, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 29 CPC subclasses with 61.5% of grants classified under G07C (Time OR Attendance REGISTERS; Registering OR Indicating THE Working OF MACHINES; Generating Random NUMBERS; Voting OR Lottery APPARATUS; Arrangements, Systems OR Apparatus FOR Checking NOT Provided FO). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2024. By volume, Moj.io sits between Mesoblast, Inc. and Mauser Werke GmbH.

Moj.io's three-year grant acceleration

MOJ.IO, Inc. shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 9 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Mesoblast

26
Millennial Media

26
Mitralign

26
Mitsubishi Plasti…

26
Motionpoint

26
Mad Apparel

26
Martin Engineering

26
Mauser Werke

26
MOJ IO ◀

26

What this shows MOJ.IO holds 26 patents at rank #11,730, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near MOJIO

By rank, the assignees closest to #11,730 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G07C (Time OR Attendance Registers)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in MOJIO's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for MOJIO, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G07C (Time OR Attendance Registers), MOJIO ranks #123 of 1,508 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (46 here).

Luna Innovations Incorporated 46 Evonik Corporation 46 LS Automotive Technologies Co., Ltd. 46 Ravin Crossbows, LLC 46

Moj.io's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

46 Top 23% higher than 77% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

MOJ.IO, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	7.7%
2016	2	7.7%
2017	2	7.7%
2018	3	11.5%
2019	3	11.5%
2020	3	11.5%
2021	3	11.5%
2022	3	11.5%
2023	2	7.7%
2024	1	3.8%
2025partial year	2	7.7%

Which technologies does MOJ.IO, Inc. patent most?

G07C - Time OR Attendance REGISTERS; Registering OR Indicating THE Working OF MACHINES; Generating Random NUMBERS; Voting OR Lottery APPARATUS; Arrangements, Systems OR Apparatus FOR Checking NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 16

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 8

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 8

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 8

B60R - Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 5

B60W - Conjoint Control OF Vehicle Sub-units OF Different Type OR Different FUNCTION; Control Systems Specially Adapted FOR Hybrid VEHICLES; Road Vehicle Drive Control Systems FOR Purposes NOT Related TO THE Control OF A Particular Sub-unit 3

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 3

G01C - Measuring Distances, Levels OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; Gyroscopic INSTRUMENTS; Photogrammetry OR Videogrammetry 2

B60C - Vehicle TYRES; Tyre INFLATION; Tyre CHANGING; Connecting Valves TO Inflatable Elastic Bodies IN GENERAL; Devices OR Arrangements Related TO Tyres 2

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 2

H04M - Telephonic Communication 2

H04Q - Selecting 2

B60Y - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Aspects Cross-cutting Vehicle Technology 1

B60K - Arrangement OR Mounting OF Propulsion Units OR OF Transmissions IN VEHICLES; Arrangement OR Mounting OF Plural Diverse Prime-movers IN VEHICLES; Auxiliary Drives FOR VEHICLES; Instrumentation OR Dashboards FOR VEHICLES; Arrangements IN Connection With Cooling, AIR Intake, GAS Exhaust OR Fuel Supply 1

Top 15 of 29 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

MOJ.IO, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

MOJ.IO, Inc.'s lead technology class is G07C (Time OR Attendance REGISTERS; Registering OR Indicating THE Working OF MACHINES; Generating Random NUMBERS; Voting OR Lottery APPARATUS; Arrangements, Systems OR Apparatus FOR Checking NOT Provided FO), 61.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G07C
Ranked #11,737 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare MOJ.IO, Inc. against Mesoblast, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 45.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.