PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Michael Todd Beauty LP

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A46B (Brushes).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Michael ranks #29,448 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 4 technology areas.

#29,448
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
39th percentile
by Innovation Score (31.8/100)
11.2
avg claims per patent
-20%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R29448 · US Corporation #29,448 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
  • MID-PACK #29,448/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Mesa Biotech
  • CPC-NARROW A46B · 4 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 31.8/100
  • CLAIMS-PAR 11.2 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DOWN -20% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Mesa Biotech LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Michael’s 31.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Michael

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Michael's Innovation Score is 31.8/100 (39th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Michael?

Each dot is one of Michael’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Michael’s own 11.2 claims/patent is at or below the 15.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Michael vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 8.98.999.1 051015202530 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Mesa Biotech LLC - 9, 25.89Mesa BiotechMetacrine, Inc. - 9, 12.44MetacrineMG Tech Center BV H.O.D.N. Lock Technology - 9, 5MG Tech Center BV…MH SUB I, LLC - 9, 20.89MH SUB IMichelson Diagnostics Ltd. - 9, 18.89Michelson Diagnos…Michigan Aerospace Corporation - 9, 15.22Michigan AerospaceMico Latta Inc. - 9, 19Mico LattaMicromedmark Biotech Co., Ltd. - 9, 11.89Micromedmark Biot…Michael Todd Beauty LP - 9, 11.22Michael Todd Beau…
Michael vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Michael's grants concentrate

Michael Todd Beauty LP is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 55.6% of grants classified under A46B (Brushes). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Michael sits between Mesa Biotech LLC and Micromedmark Biotech Co., Ltd..

Michael's three-year grant acceleration

Michael Todd Beauty LP shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Michael's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Michael holds 9 patents at rank #29,381, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Michael

By rank, the assignees closest to #29,381 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A46B (Brushes)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Michael's primary technology class.

Michael's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

32 39th percentile higher than 39% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 20172018201920212022 3
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Michael Todd Beauty LP patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2017 1 11.1%
2018 3 33.3%
2019 1 11.1%
2021 1 11.1%
2022 3 33.3%

Which technologies does Michael Todd Beauty LP patent most?

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Michael Todd Beauty LP's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Michael Todd Beauty LP's lead technology class is A46B (Brushes), 55.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A46B
  • Ranked #29,448 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Michael Todd Beauty LP against Mesa Biotech LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 31.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.