MG Tech Center BV H.O.D.N. Lock Technology
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E05B (LOCKS; Accessories THEREFOR; Handcuffs).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, MG ranks #29,444 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #29,444
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 5th percentile
- by Innovation Score (18.0/100)
- 5.0
- avg claims per patent
- -87%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R29444 · Foreign Corporation #29,444 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #29,444/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Merrimack River…
- CPC-NARROW E05B · 4 areas
- INNOV-LOW 18.0/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 5.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -87% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Merrimack River Precision Industrial Corporation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How MG’s 18.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around MG
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- MG Tech Center BV H… · this assignee 18
MG Tech Center BV H… · this assignee
18 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows MG's Innovation Score is 18.0/100 (5th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for MG?
Each dot is one of MG’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). MG’s own 5.0 claims/patent is at or below the 15.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where MG's grants concentrate
MG Tech Center BV H.O.D.N. Lock Technology is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under E05B (LOCKS; Accessories THEREFOR; Handcuffs). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, MG sits between Merrimack River Precision Industrial Corporation and Michigan Aerospace Corporation.
Who files at MG's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Merrimack River P…
Merrimack River Precision Industrial Corporation
9 patents
- Mersen France Ami…
Mersen France Amiens SAS
9 patents
- Mesa Biotech
Mesa Biotech LLC
9 patents
- Metacrine
Metacrine, Inc.
9 patents
- MH SUB I
MH SUB I, LLC
9 patents
- Michael Todd Beau…
Michael Todd Beauty LP
9 patents
- Michelson Diagnos…
Michelson Diagnostics Ltd.
9 patents
- Michigan Aerospace
Michigan Aerospace Corporation
9 patents
- MG Tech Center BV… ◀
MG Tech Center BV H.O.D.N. Lock Technology
9 patents
What this shows MG holds 9 patents at rank #29,379, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near MG
By rank, the assignees closest to #29,379 in granted patent volume.
- Merrimack River Precision Industrial Corporation #29,375 · 9 patents
- Mersen France Amiens SAS #29,376 · 9 patents
- Mesa Biotech LLC #29,377 · 9 patents
- Metacrine, Inc. #29,378 · 9 patents
- MH SUB I, LLC #29,380 · 9 patents
- Michael Todd Beauty LP #29,381 · 9 patents
- Michelson Diagnostics Ltd. #29,382 · 9 patents
- Michigan Aerospace Corporation #29,383 · 9 patents
Leaders in E05B (Locks)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in MG's primary technology class.
MG's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
18 5th percentile higher than 5% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 7 | 77.8% |
| 2019 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2020 | 1 | 11.1% |
Which technologies does MG Tech Center BV H.O.D.N. Lock Technology patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
MG Tech Center BV H.O.D.N. Lock Technology's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- MG Tech Center BV H.O.D.N. Lock Technology's lead technology class is E05B (LOCKS; Accessories THEREFOR; Handcuffs), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E05B
- Ranked #29,444 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare MG Tech Center BV H.O.D.N. Lock Technology against Merrimack River Precision Industrial Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 18.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.