Overall rank by patents
#6,564
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 51 granted patents across 42 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G01L (MEASURING FORCE, STRESS, TORQUE, WORK, MECHANICAL POWER, MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY, OR FLUID PRESSURE).
The verdict
Methode holds 51 US patents across 42 technology areas, rank #6,564 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Methode Electronics, Inc. has been granted 51 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Methode Electronics, Inc. at rank #6,564 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 42 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 18.9 claims per patent with primary concentration in G01L (MEASURING FORCE, STRESS, TORQUE, WORK, MECHANICAL POWER, MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY, OR FLUID PRESSURE). As a US Corporation, Methode Electronics, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Methode sits between MCI (mirror Controls International) Netherlands B.v. (51 patents, rank #6,560) and Mississippi State University (51 patents, rank #6,568) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 50.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 27 grants, compared with 24 in the 2015–2019 window, a +13% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Methode Electronics, Inc.'s 18.9 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 42 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Methode Electronics, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
MCI (Mirror Controls International) Netherlands B.V.
51 patents
MEDIBEACON INC.
51 patents
MITEK HOLDINGS, INC.
51 patents
MOTIVE DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
51 patents
Mettler-Toledo (Changzhou) Precision Instruments Ltd.
51 patents
Miba Sinter Austria GmbH
51 patents
Microsemi Corporation
51 patents
Mississippi State University
51 patents
Methode Electronics, Inc.
51 patents
What this shows Methode holds 51 patents at rank #6,564, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #6,564 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Methode's primary technology class.
Methode's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
51 Top 13% higher than 87% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 6 | 11.8% |
| 2016 | 5 | 9.8% |
| 2017 | 1 | 2.0% |
| 2018 | 3 | 5.9% |
| 2019 | 9 | 17.6% |
| 2020 | 8 | 15.7% |
| 2021 | 7 | 13.7% |
| 2022 | 7 | 13.7% |
| 2023 | 2 | 3.9% |
| 2024 | 1 | 2.0% |
| 2025 | 2 | 3.9% |
Top 15 of 42 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#6,564
Across all tracked assignees
50.7 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Methode's 51 grants land it in the top 13% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.