USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

MetaCure Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Metacure ranks #36,457 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 8 technology areas.

#36,457
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
40th percentile
by Innovation Score (32.2/100)
46.1
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R36457 · Foreign Corporation #36,457 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
  • MID-PACK #36,457/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Mercy Medical…
  • CPC-NARROW A61N · 8 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 32.2/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 46.1 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Mercy Medical Research Institute (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Metacure’s 32.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Metacure

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Metacure's Innovation Score is 32.2/100 (40th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Metacure?

Each dot is one of Metacure’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Metacure’s own 46.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Metacure vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 6.97.07.077.07.07.1 01020304050 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Mercy Medical Research Institute - 7, 14.57Mercy Medical Res…Meril Life Sciences PVT Ltd - 7, 12.14Meril Life Scienc…Meritage Pharma, Inc. - 7, 19.86Meritage PharmaMesa Digital, LLC - 7, 20Mesa DigitalMetisMotion GmbH - 7, 13.86MetismotionMetronom Health, Inc. - 7, 14.57Metronom HealthMettler-Toledo Measurement Technology Ltd. - 7, 11.57Mettler-toledo Me…Mezmeriz, Inc. - 7, 20.57MezmerizMetaCure Limited - 7, 46.14Metacure
Metacure vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Metacure's grants concentrate

MetaCure Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Metacure sits between Mercy Medical Research Institute and Mezmeriz, Inc..

Who files at MetaCure's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows MetaCure holds 7 patents at rank #36,500, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near MetaCure

By rank, the assignees closest to #36,500 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61N (Electrotherapy)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in MetaCure's primary technology class.

Metacure's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

32 40th percentile higher than 40% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 201520162017 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2017

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
MetaCure Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 3 42.9%
2016 3 42.9%
2017 1 14.3%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

MetaCure Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • MetaCure Limited's lead technology class is A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61N
  • Ranked #36,457 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare MetaCure Limited against Mercy Medical Research Institute, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 32.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.