MetaCure Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Metacure ranks #36,457 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #36,457
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 40th percentile
- by Innovation Score (32.2/100)
- 46.1
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R36457 · Foreign Corporation #36,457 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #36,457/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Mercy Medical…
- CPC-NARROW A61N · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 32.2/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 46.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Mercy Medical Research Institute (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Metacure’s 32.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Metacure
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- MetaCure · this assignee 32
MetaCure · this assignee
32 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Metacure's Innovation Score is 32.2/100 (40th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Metacure?
Each dot is one of Metacure’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Metacure’s own 46.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Metacure's grants concentrate
MetaCure Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Metacure sits between Mercy Medical Research Institute and Mezmeriz, Inc..
Who files at MetaCure's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Mercy Medical Res…
Mercy Medical Research Institute
7 patents
- Meril Life Scienc…
Meril Life Sciences PVT Ltd
7 patents
- Meritage Pharma
Meritage Pharma, Inc.
7 patents
- Mesa Digital
Mesa Digital, LLC
7 patents
- Metismotion
MetisMotion GmbH
7 patents
- Metronom Health
Metronom Health, Inc.
7 patents
- Mettler-toledo Me…
Mettler-Toledo Measurement Technology Ltd.
7 patents
- Mezmeriz
Mezmeriz, Inc.
7 patents
- Metacure ◀
MetaCure Limited
7 patents
What this shows MetaCure holds 7 patents at rank #36,500, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near MetaCure
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,500 in granted patent volume.
- Mercy Medical Research Institute #36,496 · 7 patents
- Meril Life Sciences PVT Ltd #36,497 · 7 patents
- Meritage Pharma, Inc. #36,498 · 7 patents
- Mesa Digital, LLC #36,499 · 7 patents
- MetisMotion GmbH #36,501 · 7 patents
- Metronom Health, Inc. #36,502 · 7 patents
- Mettler-Toledo Measurement Technology Ltd. #36,503 · 7 patents
- Mezmeriz, Inc. #36,504 · 7 patents
Leaders in A61N (Electrotherapy)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in MetaCure's primary technology class.
- Medtronic, Inc. 2,200 in class
- Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation 1,080 in class
- Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. 1,037 in class
- Pacesetter, Inc. 609 in class
- Zoll Medical Corporation 556 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 534 in class
- Cochlear Limited 449 in class
- Varian Medical Systems, Inc. 296 in class
Metacure's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 40th percentile higher than 40% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 42.9% |
| 2016 | 3 | 42.9% |
| 2017 | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does MetaCure Limited patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
MetaCure Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- MetaCure Limited's lead technology class is A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61N
- Ranked #36,457 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare MetaCure Limited against Mercy Medical Research Institute, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 32.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.