Overall rank by patents
#36,317
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 12 technology areas, active 2015–2022. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: H02G (INSTALLATION OF ELECTRIC CABLES OR LINES, OR OF COMBINED OPTICAL AND ELECTRIC CABLES OR LINES).
The verdict
M.c. holds 7 US patents across 12 technology areas, rank #36,317 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
M.c. DEAN Inc. has been granted 7 US utility patents between 2015 and 2022, placing M.c. DEAN Inc. at rank #36,317 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 12 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in H02G (INSTALLATION OF ELECTRIC CABLES OR LINES, OR OF COMBINED OPTICAL AND ELECTRIC CABLES OR LINES). As a US Corporation, M.c. DEAN Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, M.c. sits between M&M Oil Tools, Llc (7 patents, rank #36,313) and Maerz Ofenbau Ag (7 patents, rank #36,321) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 31.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 4 grants, compared with 3 in the 2015–2019 window, a +33% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. M.c. DEAN Inc.'s 17.4 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 12 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark M.c. DEAN Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
M&M Oil Tools, LLC
7 patents
M-Edge International Corporation
7 patents
M-TEC CO., LTD.
7 patents
M.A.E. S.p.A.
7 patents
MACK & SCHNEIDER GMBH
7 patents
MACRAE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
7 patents
MAD CATZ INTERACTIVE, INC.
7 patents
MAERZ OFENBAU AG
7 patents
M.C. DEAN INC.
7 patents
What this shows M.c. holds 7 patents at rank #36,317, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,317 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Mc's primary technology class.
M.c.'s Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 Top 62% higher than 38% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2021 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2022 | 1 | 14.3% |
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#36,317
Across all tracked assignees
31.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
M.c.'s 7 grants land it in the top 62% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.