M-Edge International Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04B (Transmission).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, M-edge ranks #36,329 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #36,329
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 11th percentile
- by Innovation Score (22.9/100)
- 10.6
- avg claims per patent
- +33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R36329 · US Corporation #36,329 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #36,329/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH M Cubed
- CPC-NARROW H04B · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 22.9/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 10.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-UP +33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: M Cubed Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How M-edge’s 22.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around M-edge
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- M-Edge International · this assignee 23
M-Edge International · this assignee
23 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows M-edge's Innovation Score is 22.9/100 (11th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for M-edge?
Each dot is one of M-edge’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). M-edge’s own 10.6 claims/patent is at or below the 15.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where M-edge's grants concentrate
M-Edge International Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 42.9% of grants classified under H04B (Transmission). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, M-edge sits between M Cubed Technologies, Inc. and Mack & Schneider GMBH.
Who files at M-Edge's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- M Cubed
M Cubed Technologies, Inc.
7 patents
- M et P Pharma
M et P Pharma AG
7 patents
- M&G USA
M&G USA Corporation
7 patents
- M&M Oil Tools
M&M Oil Tools, LLC
7 patents
- M-tec
M-tec Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- M A E S p A
M.A.E. S.p.A.
7 patents
- M C Dean
M.C. Dean Inc.
7 patents
- Mack & Schneider
Mack & Schneider GMBH
7 patents
- M-edge Internatio… ◀
M-Edge International Corporation
7 patents
What this shows M-Edge holds 7 patents at rank #36,314, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near M-Edge
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,314 in granted patent volume.
- M Cubed Technologies, Inc. #36,310 · 7 patents
- M et P Pharma AG #36,311 · 7 patents
- M&G USA Corporation #36,312 · 7 patents
- M&M Oil Tools, LLC #36,313 · 7 patents
- M-tec Co., Ltd. #36,315 · 7 patents
- M.A.E. S.p.A. #36,316 · 7 patents
- M.C. Dean Inc. #36,317 · 7 patents
- Mack & Schneider GMBH #36,318 · 7 patents
Leaders in H04B (Transmission)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in M-Edge's primary technology class.
- Qualcomm Incorporated 6,670 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,632 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 3,654 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 3,555 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 3,146 in class
- Apple Inc. 2,286 in class
- Intel Corporation 1,705 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,475 in class
M-edge's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 11th percentile higher than 11% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2021 | 2 | 28.6% |
Which technologies does M-Edge International Corporation patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
M-Edge International Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- M-Edge International Corporation's lead technology class is H04B (Transmission), 42.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04B
- Ranked #36,329 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare M-Edge International Corporation against M Cubed Technologies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 22.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.