Where does MAD Catz Interactive, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), MAD Catz Interactive, Inc. ranks #36,338 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does MAD Catz Interactive, Inc. hold?

MAD Catz Interactive, Inc. holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2017, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is MAD Catz Interactive, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

MAD Catz Interactive, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 21.2 out of 100 (8th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does MAD Catz Interactive, Inc. focus on?

MAD Catz Interactive, Inc.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 2 patents, ranking #9,522 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is MAD Catz Interactive, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

MAD Catz Interactive, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for MAD Catz Interactive, Inc.'s patents?

MAD Catz Interactive, Inc.'s patents average 11.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the MAD Catz Interactive, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

MAD Catz Interactive, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, MAD ranks #36,338 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 4 technology areas.

#36,338
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 8th percentile
by Innovation Score (21.2/100): 11.6
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R36338 · US Corporation #36,338 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
MID-PACK #36,338/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Mack & Schneider
CPC-NARROW G06F · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 21.2/100
CLAIMS-PAR 11.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Mack & Schneider GMBH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How MAD’s 21.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.2 pts (34%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 7.1 pts (33%) Claim depth 6.9 pts (33%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
MAD Catz Interactive · this assignee

21
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows MAD's Innovation Score is 21.2/100 (8th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for MAD?

Each dot is one of MAD’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). MAD’s own 11.6 claims/patent is at or below the 14.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

MAD vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where MAD's grants concentrate

MAD Catz Interactive, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 28.6% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, MAD sits between M.A.E. S.p.A. and Magnesium Products OF America Inc..

M A E S p A

7
M C Dean

7
Mack & Schneider

7
Macrae

7
Maerz Ofenbau

7
Maestro Devices

7
Magna Steyr Engin…

7
Magnesium Product…

7
MAD Catz Interact… ◀

7

What this shows MAD holds 7 patents at rank #36,320, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near MAD

By rank, the assignees closest to #36,320 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in MAD's primary technology class.

MAD's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

21 8th percentile higher than 8% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2017

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

MAD Catz Interactive, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	28.6%
2016	4	57.1%
2017	1	14.3%

Which technologies does MAD Catz Interactive, Inc. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 2

A63F - Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 1

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

MAD Catz Interactive, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

MAD Catz Interactive, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 28.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #36,338 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare MAD Catz Interactive, Inc. against M.A.E. S.p.A., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 21.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.