Marshall Excelsior Co.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 23 granted patents across 16 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Marshall ranks #13,041 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 23 patents across 16 technology areas.
- #13,041
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 37%
- by Innovation Score (39.9/100)
- 15.7
- avg claims per patent
- -53%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R13041 · US Corporation #13,041 · 23 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 23 grants
- MID-PACK #13,041/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Maclean-Fogg
- CPC-FOCUS Y10T · 16 areas
- INNOV-THIN 39.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -53% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Maclean-Fogg Company (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Marshall’s 39.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Marshall
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Marshall Excelsior · this assignee
Marshall Excelsior · this assignee
40 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Marshall's Innovation Score is 39.9/100 (top 37% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Marshall?
Each dot is one of Marshall’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Marshall’s own 15.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Marshall's grants concentrate
Marshall Excelsior Co. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 16 CPC subclasses with 52.2% of grants classified under Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Marshall sits between Mullen Technologies, Inc. and Megabyte Limited.
Marshall's three-year grant acceleration
Marshall Excelsior Co. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Marshall's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Mullen
Mullen Technologies, Inc.
23 patents
- Maclean-fogg
Maclean-Fogg Company
23 patents
- Magēmā Technology
Magēmā Technology LLC
23 patents
- Mahindra N A Tech…
Mahindra N.A. Tech Center
23 patents
- Mavenir Networks
Mavenir Networks, Inc.
23 patents
- Medical Energetics
Medical Energetics Limited
23 patents
- Medicinova
MediciNova, Inc.
23 patents
- Megabyte
Megabyte Limited
23 patents
- Marshall Excelsior ◀
Marshall Excelsior Co.
23 patents
What this shows Marshall holds 23 patents at rank #13,045, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Marshall
By rank, the assignees closest to #13,045 in granted patent volume.
- Mullen Technologies, Inc. #13,041 · 23 patents
- Maclean-Fogg Company #13,042 · 23 patents
- Magēmā Technology LLC #13,043 · 23 patents
- Mahindra N.A. Tech Center #13,044 · 23 patents
- Mavenir Networks, Inc. #13,046 · 23 patents
- Medical Energetics Limited #13,047 · 23 patents
- MediciNova, Inc. #13,048 · 23 patents
- Megabyte Limited #13,049 · 23 patents
Leaders in Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Marshall's primary technology class.
Marshall's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
40 Top 37% higher than 63% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 4.3% |
| 2016 | 6 | 26.1% |
| 2017 | 4 | 17.4% |
| 2018 | 2 | 8.7% |
| 2019 | 2 | 8.7% |
| 2020 | 2 | 8.7% |
| 2021 | 1 | 4.3% |
| 2022 | 2 | 8.7% |
| 2023 | 2 | 8.7% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 4.3% |
Which technologies does Marshall Excelsior Co. patent most?
Top 15 of 16 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Marshall Excelsior Co.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Marshall Excelsior Co.'s lead technology class is Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification), 52.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore Y10T
- Ranked #13,041 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Marshall Excelsior Co. against Mullen Technologies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 39.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.