USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Marshall Excelsior Co.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 23 granted patents across 16 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Marshall ranks #13,041 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 23 patents across 16 technology areas.

#13,041
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 37%
by Innovation Score (39.9/100)
15.7
avg claims per patent
-53%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R13041 · US Corporation #13,041 · 23 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 23 grants
  • MID-PACK #13,041/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Maclean-Fogg
  • CPC-FOCUS Y10T · 16 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 39.9/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 15.7 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -53% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Maclean-Fogg Company (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Marshall’s 39.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Marshall

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Marshall's Innovation Score is 39.9/100 (top 37% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Marshall?

Each dot is one of Marshall’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Marshall’s own 15.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Marshall vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 22.922.92323.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Mullen Technologies, Inc. - 23, 2.83MullenMaclean-Fogg Company - 23, 16.87Maclean-foggMagēmā Technology LLC - 23, 14.17Magēmā TechnologyMahindra N.A. Tech Center - 23, 15.48Mahindra N A Tech…Mavenir Networks, Inc. - 23, 13Mavenir NetworksMedical Energetics Limited - 23, 25.13Medical EnergeticsMediciNova, Inc. - 23, 18.26MedicinovaMegabyte Limited - 23, 1.83MegabyteMarshall Excelsior Co. - 23, 15.7Marshall Excelsior
Marshall vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Marshall's grants concentrate

Marshall Excelsior Co. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 16 CPC subclasses with 52.2% of grants classified under Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Marshall sits between Mullen Technologies, Inc. and Megabyte Limited.

Marshall's three-year grant acceleration

Marshall Excelsior Co. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Marshall's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Marshall holds 23 patents at rank #13,045, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Marshall

By rank, the assignees closest to #13,045 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Marshall's primary technology class.

Marshall's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

40 Top 37% higher than 63% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 2015201620172018201920202021202220232025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Marshall Excelsior Co. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 4.3%
2016 6 26.1%
2017 4 17.4%
2018 2 8.7%
2019 2 8.7%
2020 2 8.7%
2021 1 4.3%
2022 2 8.7%
2023 2 8.7%
2025partial year 1 4.3%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Marshall Excelsior Co.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Marshall Excelsior Co.'s lead technology class is Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification), 52.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore Y10T
  • Ranked #13,041 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Marshall Excelsior Co. against Mullen Technologies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 39.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.