Maradyne Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F15B (Systems Acting BY Means OF Fluids IN GENERAL; Fluid-pressure Actuators, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; Details OF Fluid-pressure Systems, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Maradyne ranks #48,558 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #48,558
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 14th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.1/100)
- 14.2
- avg claims per patent
- -33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R48558 · US Corporation #48,558 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #48,558/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Manta Instruments
- CPC-NARROW F15B · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.1/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DOWN -33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Manta Instruments, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Maradyne’s 24.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Maradyne
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Maradyne · this assignee 24
Maradyne · this assignee
24 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Maradyne's Innovation Score is 24.1/100 (14th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Maradyne?
Each dot is one of Maradyne’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Maradyne’s own 14.2 claims/patent is at or below the 16.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Maradyne's grants concentrate
Maradyne Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 40% of grants classified under F15B (Systems Acting BY Means OF Fluids IN GENERAL; Fluid-pressure Actuators, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; Details OF Fluid-pressure Systems, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2021. By volume, Maradyne sits between Manta Instruments, Inc. and Markesbery Blue Pearl LLC.
Who files at Maradyne's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Manta Instruments
Manta Instruments, Inc.
5 patents
- MAP Medical Solut…
MAP Medical Solutions LLC
5 patents
- Mar-med
Mar-med Inc.
5 patents
- Maradin
Maradin Ltd.
5 patents
- Marel HF
Marel HF
5 patents
- Marisense OY
Marisense OY
5 patents
- Mark Andy
Mark Andy, Inc.
5 patents
- Markesbery Blue P…
Markesbery Blue Pearl LLC
5 patents
- Maradyne ◀
Maradyne Corporation
5 patents
What this shows Maradyne holds 5 patents at rank #48,541, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Maradyne
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,541 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in F15B (Systems Acting BY Means OF Fluids IN General)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Maradyne's primary technology class.
- Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. 204 in class
- Caterpillar Inc. 185 in class
- Deere & Company 164 in class
- SMC Corporation 133 in class
- Kubota Corporation 111 in class
- Volvo Construction Equipment AB 102 in class
- Kawasaki Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha 97 in class
- Parker-Hannifin Corporation 97 in class
Maradyne's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
24 14th percentile higher than 14% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 3 | 60.0% |
| 2021 | 2 | 40.0% |
Which technologies does Maradyne Corporation patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Maradyne Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Maradyne Corporation's lead technology class is F15B (Systems Acting BY Means OF Fluids IN GENERAL; Fluid-pressure Actuators, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; Details OF Fluid-pressure Systems, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 40% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F15B
- Ranked #48,558 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Maradyne Corporation against Manta Instruments, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.