Where does Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd. ranks #24,748 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd. hold?

Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd. holds 11 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2024, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 28.7 out of 100 (28th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is +20% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd.'s patents?

Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd.'s patents average 9.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd.

Q: What technology areas does Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd. focus on?

Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd.'s top technology area is F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive OR Combustible Propellant CHARGE; Weapons NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 10 patents, ranking #23 of 154 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive OR Combustible Propellant CHARGE; Weapons NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Man ranks #24,748 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 3 technology areas.

#24,748
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 28th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.7/100): 9.4
avg claims per patent: +20%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R24748 · Foreign Corporation #24,748 · 11 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
MID-PACK #24,748/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Magic Control…
CPC-NARROW F41B · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 28.7/100
CLAIMS-PAR 9.4 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-UP +20% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Magic Control Technology Corporation (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Man’s 28.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.6 pts (30%) Velocity 8.3 pts (29%) Breadth 6.1 pts (21%) Claim depth 5.6 pts (20%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Man Kung Enterprise · this assignee

29
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Man's Innovation Score is 28.7/100 (28th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Man?

Each dot is one of Man’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Man’s own 9.4 claims/patent is at or below the 18.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Man vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Man's grants concentrate

Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 90.9% of grants classified under F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive OR Combustible Propellant CHARGE; Weapons NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Man sits between Magic Control Technology Corporation and Marlow Industries, Inc..

Man's three-year grant acceleration

Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Magic Control Tec…

11
Magna Solutions

11
Magnetek

11
Malema Engineering

11
Manheim Investmen…

11
Marathonnorco Aer…

11
Markport

11
Marlow Industries

11
Man Kung Enterpri… ◀

11

What this shows Man holds 11 patents at rank #24,781, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Man

By rank, the assignees closest to #24,781 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Man's primary technology class.

Man's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

29 28th percentile higher than 28% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	2	18.2%
2019	3	27.3%
2021	1	9.1%
2022	1	9.1%
2023	3	27.3%
2024	1	9.1%

Which technologies does Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd. patent most?

F41B - Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive OR Combustible Propellant CHARGE; Weapons NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 10

F41A - Functional Features OR Details Common TO Both Smallarms AND Ordnance, e.g. CANNONS; Mountings FOR Smallarms OR Ordnance 4

F41G - Weapon SIGHTS; Aiming 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive OR Combustible Propellant CHARGE; Weapons NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 90.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F41B
Ranked #24,748 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Man Kung Enterprise Co., Ltd. against Magic Control Technology Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 28.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.