Overall rank by patents
#36,218
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 15 technology areas, active 2019–2023. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B32B (LAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM).
The verdict
LOW holds 7 US patents across 15 technology areas, rank #36,218 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
LOW & Bonar Inc. has been granted 7 US utility patents between 2019 and 2023, placing LOW & Bonar Inc. at rank #36,218 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 15 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.9 claims per patent with primary concentration in B32B (LAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM). As a US Corporation, LOW & Bonar Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, LOW sits between Logicmark, Inc. (7 patents, rank #36,214) and Lucidlogix Technologies Ltd (7 patents, rank #36,222) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 36.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 6 grants, compared with 1 in the 2015–2019 window, a +500% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. LOW & Bonar Inc.'s 17.9 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 15 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark LOW & Bonar Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
LOGICMARK, INC.
7 patents
LOGISIG INC.
7 patents
LOOK SHARP LABS, INC.
7 patents
LORAMENDI, S. COOP.
7 patents
LT LIGHTING (TAIWAN) CORP.
7 patents
LTA Research and Exploration, LLC
7 patents
LTEOIL LLC
7 patents
LUCIDLOGIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD
7 patents
LOW & BONAR INC.
7 patents
What this shows LOW holds 7 patents at rank #36,218, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,218 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in LOW's primary technology class.
LOW's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
37 Top 46% higher than 54% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2021 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2023 | 2 | 28.6% |
Top 15 of 15 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#36,218
Across all tracked assignees
36.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
LOW's 7 grants land it in the top 46% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.