Where does LOW & Bonar Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), LOW & Bonar Inc. ranks #36,301 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does LOW & Bonar Inc. hold?

LOW & Bonar Inc. holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2023, spanning 15 technology areas.

What is LOW & Bonar Inc.'s Innovation Score?

LOW & Bonar Inc. has an Innovation Score of 36.6 out of 100 (top 46% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does LOW & Bonar Inc. focus on?

LOW & Bonar Inc.'s top technology area is B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form) with 4 patents, ranking #899 of 3,088 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 15 CPC subclasses total.

Is LOW & Bonar Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

LOW & Bonar Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +500% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for LOW & Bonar Inc.'s patents?

LOW & Bonar Inc.'s patents average 17.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the LOW & Bonar Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

LOW & Bonar Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 15 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, LOW ranks #36,301 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 15 technology areas.

#36,301
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 46%
by Innovation Score (36.6/100): 17.9
avg claims per patent: +500%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R36301 · US Corporation #36,301 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
MID-PACK #36,301/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Logicmark
CPC-FOCUS B32B · 15 areas
INNOV-THIN 36.6/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.9 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +500% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Logicmark, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How LOW’s 36.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.2 pts (20%) Velocity 5.0 pts (14%) Breadth 13.7 pts (37%) Claim depth 10.7 pts (29%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
LOW & Bonar · this assignee

37
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows LOW's Innovation Score is 36.6/100 (top 46% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for LOW?

Each dot is one of LOW’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). LOW’s own 17.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

LOW vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where LOW's grants concentrate

LOW & Bonar Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 15 CPC subclasses with 57.1% of grants classified under B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, LOW sits between Logicmark, Inc. and Lucidlogix Technologies Ltd.

LOW's three-year grant acceleration

LOW & Bonar Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Logicmark

7
Logisig

7
Look Sharp Labs

7
Loramendi S Coop

7
LT Lighting (Taiw…

7
LTA Research and…

7
Lteoil

7
Lucidlogix

7
LOW & Bonar ◀

7

What this shows LOW holds 7 patents at rank #36,218, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near LOW

By rank, the assignees closest to #36,218 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B32B (Layered Products)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in LOW's primary technology class.

LOW's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

37 Top 46% higher than 54% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

LOW & Bonar Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	1	14.3%
2020	2	28.6%
2021	1	14.3%
2022	1	14.3%
2023	2	28.6%

Which technologies does LOW & Bonar Inc. patent most?

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 4

E04D - Roof COVERINGS; SKY-LIGHTS; GUTTERS; Roof-working Tools 3

E04F - Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors 3

E04B - General Building CONSTRUCTIONS; Walls, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; Insulation OR Other Protection OF Buildings 3

B29L - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles 2

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 2

D04H - Making Textile Fabrics, e.g. From Fibres OR Filamentary Material ; Fabrics Made BY Such Processes OR Apparatus, e.g. Felts, Non-woven FABRICS; COTTON-WOOL; Wadding ; ; Non-woven Fabrics From Staple Fibres, Filaments OR Yarns, Bonded With AT Least ONE Web-like Material During Their Consolidation 1

B68G - Methods, Equipment, OR Machines FOR USE IN UPHOLSTERING; Upholstery NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

A47C - CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds 1

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 1

C09K - Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 1

A01G - HORTICULTURE; Cultivation OF Vegetables, Flowers, Rice, Fruit, Vines, Hops OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; Watering 1

Y02A - Technologies FOR Adaptation TO Climate Change 1

F24F - AIR-CONDITIONING; AIR-HUMIDIFICATION; VENTILATION; USE OF AIR Currents FOR Screening 1

B01D - Separation 1

Top 15 of 15 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

LOW & Bonar Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

LOW & Bonar Inc.'s lead technology class is B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form), 57.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B32B
Ranked #36,301 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare LOW & Bonar Inc. against Logicmark, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 36.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.