Logicmark, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G08B (Signalling OR Calling SYSTEMS; Order TELEGRAPHS; Alarm Systems).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Logicmark ranks #36,291 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #36,291
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 21%
- by Innovation Score (46.5/100)
- 15.6
- avg claims per patent
- +50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R36291 · US Corporation #36,291 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #36,291/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH LN2 DB
- CPC-NARROW G08B · 8 areas
- INNOV-PAR 46.5/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: LN2 DB, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Logicmark’s 46.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Logicmark
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Logicmark · this assignee
Logicmark · this assignee
47 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Logicmark's Innovation Score is 46.5/100 (top 21% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Logicmark?
Each dot is one of Logicmark’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Logicmark’s own 15.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Logicmark's grants concentrate
Logicmark, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G08B (Signalling OR Calling SYSTEMS; Order TELEGRAPHS; Alarm Systems). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Logicmark sits between LN2 DB, LLC and LOW & Bonar Inc..
Logicmark's three-year grant acceleration
Logicmark, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Logicmark's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- LN2 DB
LN2 DB, LLC
7 patents
- LNJ Group
LNJ Group, LLC
7 patents
- Lobo Systems
Lobo Systems Limited
7 patents
- Locus IP
Locus IP Company, LLC
7 patents
- Logisig
Logisig Inc.
7 patents
- Look Sharp Labs
Look Sharp Labs, Inc.
7 patents
- Loramendi S Coop
Loramendi, S. Coop.
7 patents
- LOW & Bonar
LOW & Bonar Inc.
7 patents
- Logicmark ◀
Logicmark, Inc.
7 patents
What this shows Logicmark holds 7 patents at rank #36,214, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Logicmark
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,214 in granted patent volume.
- LN2 DB, LLC #36,210 · 7 patents
- LNJ Group, LLC #36,211 · 7 patents
- Lobo Systems Limited #36,212 · 7 patents
- Locus IP Company, LLC #36,213 · 7 patents
- Logisig Inc. #36,215 · 7 patents
- Look Sharp Labs, Inc. #36,216 · 7 patents
- Loramendi, S. Coop. #36,217 · 7 patents
- LOW & Bonar Inc. #36,218 · 7 patents
Leaders in G08B (Signalling OR Calling Systems)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Logicmark's primary technology class.
Logicmark's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
47 Top 21% higher than 79% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2024 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 28.6% |
Which technologies does Logicmark, Inc. patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Logicmark, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Logicmark, Inc.'s lead technology class is G08B (Signalling OR Calling SYSTEMS; Order TELEGRAPHS; Alarm Systems), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G08B
- Ranked #36,291 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Logicmark, Inc. against LN2 DB, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 46.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.