LOW & Bonar B.V.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 14 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, LOW ranks #41,489 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 14 technology areas.
- #41,489
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 27%
- by Innovation Score (44.0/100)
- 17.8
- avg claims per patent
- -50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R41489 · Foreign Corporation #41,489 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #41,489/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Lonvis Technology…
- CPC-FOCUS B32B · 14 areas
- INNOV-PAR 44.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Lonvis Technology (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How LOW’s 44.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around LOW
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- LOW & Bonar B V · this assignee
LOW & Bonar B V · this assignee
44 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows LOW's Innovation Score is 44.0/100 (top 27% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for LOW?
Each dot is one of LOW’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). LOW’s own 17.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 6.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where LOW's grants concentrate
LOW & Bonar B.V. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 14 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, LOW sits between Lonvis Technology (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd and Ltcam Co., Ltd..
LOW's three-year grant acceleration
LOW & Bonar B.V. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at LOW's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Lonvis Technology…
Lonvis Technology (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd
6 patents
- Loop BV
Loop BV
6 patents
- Loto Safety Produ…
Loto Safety Products Dmcc
6 patents
- Loving Pets
Loving Pets Corporation
6 patents
- Lowbrow Customs
Lowbrow Customs, LLC
6 patents
- Lowcarbon
Lowcarbon Co., Ltd
6 patents
- Industries
LP Industries LLC
6 patents
- Ltcam
Ltcam Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- LOW & Bonar B V ◀
LOW & Bonar B.V.
6 patents
What this shows LOW holds 6 patents at rank #41,377, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near LOW
By rank, the assignees closest to #41,377 in granted patent volume.
- Lonvis Technology (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd #41,373 · 6 patents
- Loop BV #41,374 · 6 patents
- Loto Safety Products Dmcc #41,375 · 6 patents
- Loving Pets Corporation #41,376 · 6 patents
- Lowbrow Customs, LLC #41,378 · 6 patents
- Lowcarbon Co., Ltd #41,379 · 6 patents
- LP Industries LLC #41,380 · 6 patents
- Ltcam Co., Ltd. #41,381 · 6 patents
Leaders in B32B (Layered Products)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in LOW's primary technology class.
LOW's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
44 Top 27% higher than 73% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2023 | 2 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does LOW & Bonar B.V. patent most?
Top 14 of 14 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
LOW & Bonar B.V.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- LOW & Bonar B.V.'s lead technology class is B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B32B
- Ranked #41,489 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare LOW & Bonar B.V. against Lonvis Technology (SHENZHEN) Co., Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 44.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.