LN2 DB, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, LN2 ranks #36,284 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #36,284
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 17th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.2/100)
- 18.3
- avg claims per patent
- -83%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R36284 · US Corporation #36,284 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #36,284/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Livent USA
- CPC-NARROW H04L · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -83% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Livent USA Corp. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How LN2’s 25.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around LN2
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- LN2 DB · this assignee 25
LN2 DB · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows LN2's Innovation Score is 25.2/100 (17th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for LN2?
Each dot is one of LN2’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). LN2’s own 18.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where LN2's grants concentrate
LN2 DB, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, LN2 sits between Livent USA Corp. and Logicmark, Inc..
Who files at LN2's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Livent USA
Livent USA Corp.
7 patents
- Liverpool John Mo…
Liverpool John Moores University
7 patents
- LJ Star
LJ Star, Inc.
7 patents
- LN1
LN1 Inc.
7 patents
- LNJ Group
LNJ Group, LLC
7 patents
- Lobo Systems
Lobo Systems Limited
7 patents
- Locus IP
Locus IP Company, LLC
7 patents
- Logicmark
Logicmark, Inc.
7 patents
- LN2 DB ◀
LN2 DB, LLC
7 patents
What this shows LN2 holds 7 patents at rank #36,210, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near LN2
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,210 in granted patent volume.
- Livent USA Corp. #36,206 · 7 patents
- Liverpool John Moores University #36,207 · 7 patents
- LJ Star, Inc. #36,208 · 7 patents
- LN1 Inc. #36,209 · 7 patents
- LNJ Group, LLC #36,211 · 7 patents
- Lobo Systems Limited #36,212 · 7 patents
- Locus IP Company, LLC #36,213 · 7 patents
- Logicmark, Inc. #36,214 · 7 patents
Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in LN2's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 15,969 in class
- Qualcomm Incorporated 13,594 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 11,697 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 10,543 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 9,062 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 8,543 in class
- Cisco Technology, Inc. 7,502 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 7,301 in class
LN2's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 17th percentile higher than 17% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 3 | 42.9% |
| 2017 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2018 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does LN2 DB, LLC patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
LN2 DB, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- LN2 DB, LLC's lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
- Ranked #36,284 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare LN2 DB, LLC against Livent USA Corp., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.